linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:09:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130701053947.GQ8362@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130628135422.GA21895@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

* Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2013-06-28 19:24:22]:

> * Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> [2013-06-26 15:37:59]:
> 
> > It's several months overdue and everything was quiet after 3.8 came out
> > but I recently had a chance to revisit automatic NUMA balancing for a few
> > days. I looked at basic scheduler integration resulting in the following
> > small series. Much of the following is heavily based on the numacore series
> > which in itself takes part of the autonuma series from back in November. In
> > particular it borrows heavily from Peter Ziljstra's work in "sched, numa,
> > mm: Add adaptive NUMA affinity support" but deviates too much to preserve
> > Signed-off-bys. As before, if the relevant authors are ok with it I'll
> > add Signed-off-bys (or add them yourselves if you pick the patches up).
> 
> 
> Here is a snapshot of the results of running autonuma-benchmark running on 8
> node 64 cpu system with hyper threading disabled. Ran 5 iterations for each
> setup
> 
> 	KernelVersion: 3.9.0-mainline_v39+()
> 				Testcase:      Min      Max      Avg
> 				  numa01:  1784.16  1864.15  1800.16
> 				  numa02:    32.07    32.72    32.59
> 
> 	KernelVersion: 3.9.0-mainline_v39+() + mel's patches
> 				Testcase:      Min      Max      Avg  %Change
> 				  numa01:  1752.48  1859.60  1785.60    0.82%
> 				  numa02:    47.21    60.58    53.43  -39.00%
> 
> So numa02 case; we see a degradation of around 39%.
> 

I reran the tests again 

KernelVersion: 3.9.0-mainline_v39+()
                        Testcase:      Min      Max      Avg
                          numa01:  1784.16  1864.15  1800.16
             numa01_THREAD_ALLOC:   293.75   315.35   311.03
                          numa02:    32.07    32.72    32.59
                      numa02_SMT:    39.27    39.79    39.69

KernelVersion: 3.9.0-mainline_v39+() + your patches
                        Testcase:      Min      Max      Avg  %Change
                          numa01:  1720.40  1876.89  1767.75    1.83%
             numa01_THREAD_ALLOC:   464.34   554.82   496.64  -37.37%
                          numa02:    52.02    58.57    56.21  -42.02%
                      numa02_SMT:    42.07    52.64    47.33  -16.14%


-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-01  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-26 14:37 [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: numa: Document automatic NUMA balancing sysctls Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched: Track NUMA hinting faults on per-node basis Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 15:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 12:22     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28  6:08   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  8:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 12:30     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched: Select a preferred node with the most numa hinting faults Mel Gorman
2013-06-28  6:14   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  8:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 10:24       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 12:33     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 4/8] sched: Update NUMA hinting faults once per scan Mel Gorman
2013-06-28  6:32   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  9:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched: Favour moving tasks towards the preferred node Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-27 14:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:00     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 16:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:01     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 16:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:45     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 15:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28  8:11   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  9:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 10:07       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 10:24         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:51         ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 17:14           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 17:34             ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 17:44               ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched: Reschedule task on preferred NUMA node once selected Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:54     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-02 12:06   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-02 16:29     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-02 18:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-06  6:44       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-06 10:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-02 18:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03  9:50     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 15:28       ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:46         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 7/8] sched: Split accounting of NUMA hinting faults that pass two-stage filter Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 14:00     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28  7:00   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  9:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 10:12       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 10:33         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 14:29           ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 15:12             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 8/8] sched: Increase NUMA PTE scanning when a new preferred node is selected Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:59 ` [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-01  5:39   ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2013-07-01  8:43     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-02  5:28       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-02  7:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-02  8:55     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130701053947.GQ8362@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).