linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: slab shrinkers: BUG at mm/list_lru.c:92
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 22:19:47 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130702121947.GE14996@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130702092200.GB16815@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:22:00AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 01-07-13 18:10:56, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:50:05AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 01-07-13 11:25:58, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > That is the recycle stat, which indicates we've found an inode being
> > reclaimed. When it's found an inode that have been evicted, but not
> > yet reclaimed at the XFS level, that stat will increase. If the
> > inode is still valid at the VFS level, and igrab() fails, then we'll
> > get EAGAIN without that stat being increased. So, igrab() is
> > failing, and that means I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE are set.
> > 
> > So, it looks to be the same case as the ext4 hang, and it's likely
> > that we have some dangling inode dispose list somewhere. So, here's
> > the fun part. Use tracing to grab the inode number that is stuck
> > (tracepoint xfs::xfs_iget_skip), 
> 
> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe > demon.trace.log &
> $ pid=$!
> $ sleep 10s ; kill $pid
> $ awk '{print $1, $9}' demon.trace.log | sort -u
> cc1-7561 0xf78d4f
> cc1-9100 0x80b2a35
.....
> 
> > and the dispose list that it is on should be the on the
> > inode->i_lru_list. 
> 
> crash> struct inode.i_lru ffff88000c09e2f8
>   i_lru = {
>     next = 0xffff88000c09e3e8, 
>     prev = 0xffff88000c09e3e8
>   }

Hmmm, that's empty.

> crash> struct inode.i_flags ffff88000c09e2f8
>   i_flags = 4096

I asked for the wrong field, I wanted i_state, but seeing as you:

> The full xfs_inode dump is attached.

Dumped the whole inode, I got it from below :)

>     i_state = 32, 

so, i_state = I_FREEING.

IOWs, we've got an inode marked I_FREEING that isn't on a dispose
list but hasn't passed through evict() correctly.

> crash> struct xfs_inode ffff88000c09e1c0
> struct xfs_inode {
.....
>   i_flags = 0, 

XFS doesn't see the inode as reclaimable yet, either.

Ok, so it's been leaked from a dispose list somehow. Thanks for the
info, Michal, it's time to go look at the code....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-02 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-17 14:18 linux-next: slab shrinkers: BUG at mm/list_lru.c:92 Michal Hocko
2013-06-17 15:14 ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-17 15:33   ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-17 16:54     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-18  7:42       ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-17 21:35   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-17 22:30     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-18  2:46       ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-18  6:31         ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-18  8:24           ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-18 10:44             ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-18 13:50               ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-25  2:27                 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-26  8:15                   ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-26 23:24                     ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-27 14:54                       ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-28  8:39                         ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-28 14:31                           ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-28 15:12                             ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-29  2:55                         ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-30 18:33                           ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-01  1:25                             ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-01  7:50                               ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-01  8:10                                 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-02  9:22                                   ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-02 12:19                                     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-07-02 12:44                                       ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-03 11:24                                         ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-03 14:08                                           ` Glauber Costa
2013-07-04 16:36                                           ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-08 12:53                                             ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-08 21:04                                               ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-09 17:34                                                 ` Glauber Costa
2013-07-09 17:51                                                   ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-09 17:32                                               ` Glauber Costa
2013-07-09 17:50                                                 ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-09 17:57                                                   ` Glauber Costa
2013-07-09 17:57                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-09 21:39                                                   ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-10  2:31                                               ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-10  7:34                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-10  8:06                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-11  2:26                                                   ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-11  3:03                                                     ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-11 13:23                                                     ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-12  1:42                                                       ` Hugh Dickins
2013-07-13  3:29                                                         ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-15  9:14                                             ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-18  6:26       ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-18  8:25         ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-19  7:13         ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-19  7:35           ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-19  8:52             ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-19 13:57             ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-19 14:02               ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-19 14:28           ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-20 14:11             ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-20 15:12               ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-20 15:16                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-21  9:00                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-23 11:51                   ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-23 11:55                     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-25  2:29                     ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-26  8:22                     ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-18  8:19       ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-18  8:21         ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-18  8:26           ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130702121947.GE14996@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=glommer@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).