* [PATCH] mm: cleanup backing_dev_info foo_stamp fields
@ 2013-07-05 15:50 Maxim Patlasov
2013-07-09 17:06 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Patlasov @ 2013-07-05 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm
Cc: riel, jack, dev, miklos, fuse-devel, bfoster, xemul, linux-kernel,
jbottomley, linux-mm, viro, linux-fsdevel, fengguang.wu, devel,
mgorman
State clearly that bw_time_stamp is measured in jiffies. Rename other
foo_stamp fields to reflect that they are in units of number-of-pages.
Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com>
---
include/linux/backing-dev.h | 7 ++++---
mm/backing-dev.c | 2 +-
mm/page-writeback.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
index c388155..ee7eb1a 100644
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
@@ -73,9 +73,10 @@ struct backing_dev_info {
struct percpu_counter bdi_stat[NR_BDI_STAT_ITEMS];
- unsigned long bw_time_stamp; /* last time write bw is updated */
- unsigned long dirtied_stamp;
- unsigned long written_stamp; /* pages written at bw_time_stamp */
+ unsigned long bw_time_stamp; /* last time (in jiffies) write bw
+ * is updated */
+ unsigned long dirtied_nr_stamp;
+ unsigned long written_nr_stamp; /* pages written at bw_time_stamp */
unsigned long write_bandwidth; /* the estimated write bandwidth */
unsigned long avg_write_bandwidth; /* further smoothed write bw */
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index 5025174..82efe7f 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ int bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
bdi->dirty_exceeded = 0;
bdi->bw_time_stamp = jiffies;
- bdi->written_stamp = 0;
+ bdi->written_nr_stamp = 0;
bdi->balanced_dirty_ratelimit = INIT_BW;
bdi->dirty_ratelimit = INIT_BW;
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 4514ad7..088a8db 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ static void bdi_update_write_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
* write_bandwidth = ---------------------------------------------------
* period
*/
- bw = written - bdi->written_stamp;
+ bw = written - bdi->written_nr_stamp;
bw *= HZ;
if (unlikely(elapsed > period)) {
do_div(bw, elapsed);
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ static void bdi_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
* The dirty rate will match the writeout rate in long term, except
* when dirty pages are truncated by userspace or re-dirtied by FS.
*/
- dirty_rate = (dirtied - bdi->dirtied_stamp) * HZ / elapsed;
+ dirty_rate = (dirtied - bdi->dirtied_nr_stamp) * HZ / elapsed;
pos_ratio = bdi_position_ratio(bdi, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty);
@@ -1066,8 +1066,8 @@ void __bdi_update_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
bdi_update_write_bandwidth(bdi, elapsed, written);
snapshot:
- bdi->dirtied_stamp = dirtied;
- bdi->written_stamp = written;
+ bdi->dirtied_nr_stamp = dirtied;
+ bdi->written_nr_stamp = written;
bdi->bw_time_stamp = now;
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: cleanup backing_dev_info foo_stamp fields
2013-07-05 15:50 [PATCH] mm: cleanup backing_dev_info foo_stamp fields Maxim Patlasov
@ 2013-07-09 17:06 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2013-07-09 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxim Patlasov
Cc: akpm, riel, jack, dev, miklos, fuse-devel, bfoster, xemul,
linux-kernel, jbottomley, linux-mm, viro, linux-fsdevel,
fengguang.wu, devel, mgorman
On Fri 05-07-13 19:50:41, Maxim Patlasov wrote:
> State clearly that bw_time_stamp is measured in jiffies. Rename other
> foo_stamp fields to reflect that they are in units of number-of-pages.
>
> Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com>
Looks good. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> include/linux/backing-dev.h | 7 ++++---
> mm/backing-dev.c | 2 +-
> mm/page-writeback.c | 8 ++++----
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> index c388155..ee7eb1a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> @@ -73,9 +73,10 @@ struct backing_dev_info {
>
> struct percpu_counter bdi_stat[NR_BDI_STAT_ITEMS];
>
> - unsigned long bw_time_stamp; /* last time write bw is updated */
> - unsigned long dirtied_stamp;
> - unsigned long written_stamp; /* pages written at bw_time_stamp */
> + unsigned long bw_time_stamp; /* last time (in jiffies) write bw
> + * is updated */
> + unsigned long dirtied_nr_stamp;
> + unsigned long written_nr_stamp; /* pages written at bw_time_stamp */
> unsigned long write_bandwidth; /* the estimated write bandwidth */
> unsigned long avg_write_bandwidth; /* further smoothed write bw */
>
> diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
> index 5025174..82efe7f 100644
> --- a/mm/backing-dev.c
> +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
> @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ int bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
> bdi->dirty_exceeded = 0;
>
> bdi->bw_time_stamp = jiffies;
> - bdi->written_stamp = 0;
> + bdi->written_nr_stamp = 0;
>
> bdi->balanced_dirty_ratelimit = INIT_BW;
> bdi->dirty_ratelimit = INIT_BW;
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 4514ad7..088a8db 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ static void bdi_update_write_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> * write_bandwidth = ---------------------------------------------------
> * period
> */
> - bw = written - bdi->written_stamp;
> + bw = written - bdi->written_nr_stamp;
> bw *= HZ;
> if (unlikely(elapsed > period)) {
> do_div(bw, elapsed);
> @@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ static void bdi_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> * The dirty rate will match the writeout rate in long term, except
> * when dirty pages are truncated by userspace or re-dirtied by FS.
> */
> - dirty_rate = (dirtied - bdi->dirtied_stamp) * HZ / elapsed;
> + dirty_rate = (dirtied - bdi->dirtied_nr_stamp) * HZ / elapsed;
>
> pos_ratio = bdi_position_ratio(bdi, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
> bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty);
> @@ -1066,8 +1066,8 @@ void __bdi_update_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> bdi_update_write_bandwidth(bdi, elapsed, written);
>
> snapshot:
> - bdi->dirtied_stamp = dirtied;
> - bdi->written_stamp = written;
> + bdi->dirtied_nr_stamp = dirtied;
> + bdi->written_nr_stamp = written;
> bdi->bw_time_stamp = now;
> }
>
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-09 17:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-05 15:50 [PATCH] mm: cleanup backing_dev_info foo_stamp fields Maxim Patlasov
2013-07-09 17:06 ` Jan Kara
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).