Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Support multiple pages allocation

[Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>]

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:00:44PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 04-07-13 13:24:50, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:01:43AM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote:
> > > On 07/03/2013 11:51 PM, Zhang Yanfei wrote:
> > > > On 07/03/2013 11:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > >> On Wed 03-07-13 17:34:15, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > >> [...]
> > > >>> For one page allocation at once, this patchset makes allocator slower than
> > > >>> before (-5%). 
> > > >>
> > > >> Slowing down the most used path is a no-go. Where does this slow down
> > > >> come from?
> > > > 
> > > > I guess, it might be: for one page allocation at once, comparing to the original
> > > > code, this patch adds two parameters nr_pages and pages and will do extra checks
> > > > for the parameter nr_pages in the allocation path.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > If so, adding a separate path for the multiple allocations seems better.
> > 
> > Hello, all.
> > 
> > I modify the code for optimizing one page allocation via likely macro.
> > I attach a new one at the end of this mail.
> > 
> > In this case, performance degradation for one page allocation at once is -2.5%.
> > I guess, remained overhead comes from two added parameters.
> > Is it unreasonable cost to support this new feature?
> 
> Which benchmark you are using for this testing?

I use my own module which do allocation repeatedly.

> 
> > I think that readahead path is one of the most used path, so this penalty looks
> > endurable. And after supporting this feature, we can find more use cases.
> 
> What about page faults? I would oppose that page faults are _much_ more
> frequent than read ahead so you really cannot slow them down.

You mean page faults for anon?
Yes. I also think that it is much more frequent than read ahead.
Before futher discussion, I will try to add a separate path
for the multiple allocations.

Thanks.

> 
> [...]
> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>