From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"AneeshKumarK.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugepage: allow parallelization of the hugepage fault path
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:42:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130718084235.GA9761@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374090625.15271.2.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:50:25PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
>
> At present, the page fault path for hugepages is serialized by a
> single mutex. This is used to avoid spurious out-of-memory conditions
> when the hugepage pool is fully utilized (two processes or threads can
> race to instantiate the same mapping with the last hugepage from the
> pool, the race loser returning VM_FAULT_OOM). This problem is
> specific to hugepages, because it is normal to want to use every
> single hugepage in the system - with normal pages we simply assume
> there will always be a few spare pages which can be used temporarily
> until the race is resolved.
>
> Unfortunately this serialization also means that clearing of hugepages
> cannot be parallelized across multiple CPUs, which can lead to very
> long process startup times when using large numbers of hugepages.
>
> This patch improves the situation by replacing the single mutex with a
> table of mutexes, selected based on a hash, which allows us to know
> which page in the file we're instantiating. For shared mappings, the
> hash key is selected based on the address space and file offset being faulted.
> Similarly, for private mappings, the mm and virtual address are used.
>
Hello.
With this table mutex, we cannot protect region tracking structure.
See below comment.
/*
* Region tracking -- allows tracking of reservations and instantiated pages
* across the pages in a mapping.
*
* The region data structures are protected by a combination of the mmap_sem
* and the hugetlb_instantion_mutex. To access or modify a region the caller
* must either hold the mmap_sem for write, or the mmap_sem for read and
* the hugetlb_instantiation mutex:
*
* down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
* or
* down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
* mutex_lock(&hugetlb_instantiation_mutex);
*/
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-18 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-12 23:28 [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: per-vma instantiation mutexes Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-13 0:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-07-15 3:16 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-15 7:24 ` David Gibson
2013-07-15 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-16 0:12 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-16 8:00 ` David Gibson
2013-07-17 19:50 ` [PATCH] hugepage: allow parallelization of the hugepage fault path Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-18 8:42 ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2013-07-19 7:14 ` David Gibson
2013-07-19 21:24 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-22 0:59 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-18 9:07 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-19 0:19 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-19 0:35 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-23 7:04 ` Hush Bensen
2013-07-23 6:55 ` Hush Bensen
2013-07-16 1:51 ` [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: per-vma instantiation mutexes Rik van Riel
2013-07-16 5:34 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 10:01 ` David Gibson
2013-07-18 6:50 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 8:20 ` David Gibson
2013-07-15 4:18 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130718084235.GA9761@lge.com \
--to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=emunson@mgebm.net \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).