From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx180.postini.com [74.125.245.180]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F9376B0034 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:14:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id w10so2020213lbi.7 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:14:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 18:14:17 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Save soft-dirty bits on file pages Message-ID: <20130729141417.GM2524@moon> References: <20130726201807.GJ8661@moon> <51F67777.6060609@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51F67777.6060609@parallels.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Pavel Emelyanov Cc: Linux MM , LKML , Andy Lutomirski , Andrew Morton , Matt Mackall , Xiao Guangrong , Marcelo Tosatti , KOSAKI Motohiro , Stephen Rothwell On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 06:08:55PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > > > > - if (!pte_none(*pte)) > > + ptfile = pgoff_to_pte(pgoff); > > + > > + if (!pte_none(*pte)) { > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY > > + if (pte_present(*pte) && > > + pte_soft_dirty(*pte)) > > I think there's no need in wrapping every such if () inside #ifdef CONFIG_..., > since the pte_soft_dirty() routine itself would be 0 for non-soft-dirty case > and compiler would optimize this code out. If only I'm not missing something obvious, this code compiles not only on x86, CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY depends on x86 (otherwise I'll have to implement pte_soft_dirty for all archs). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org