linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Lisa Du <cldu@marvell.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: Possible deadloop in direct reclaim?
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 14:43:38 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130801054338.GD19540@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89813612683626448B837EE5A0B6A7CB3B62F8F272@SC-VEXCH4.marvell.com>

Hello,

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:58:17PM -0700, Lisa Du wrote:
> Dear Sir:
> Currently I met a possible deadloop in direct reclaim. After run plenty of the application, system run into a status that system memory is very fragmentized. Like only order-0 and order-1 memory left.
> Then one process required a order-2 buffer but it enter an endless direct reclaim. From my trace log, I can see this loop already over 200,000 times. Kswapd was first wake up and then go back to sleep as it cannot rebalance this order's memory. But zone->all_unreclaimable remains 1.
> Though direct_reclaim every time returns no pages, but as zone->all_unreclaimable = 1, so it loop again and again. Even when zone->pages_scanned also becomes very large. It will block the process for long time, until some watchdog thread detect this and kill this process. Though it's in __alloc_pages_slowpath, but it's too slow right? Maybe cost over 50 seconds or even more.
> I think it's not as expected right?  Can we also add below check in the function all_unreclaimable() to terminate this loop?
> 
> @@ -2355,6 +2355,8 @@ static bool all_unreclaimable(struct zonelist *zonelist,
>                         continue;
>                 if (!zone->all_unreclaimable)
>                         return false;
> +               if (sc->nr_reclaimed == 0 && !zone_reclaimable(zone))
> +                       return true;
>         }
>          BTW: I'm using kernel3.4, I also try to search in the kernel3.9, didn't see a possible fix for such issue. Or is anyone also met such issue before? Any comment will be welcomed, looking forward to your reply!
> 
> Thanks!

I'd like to ask somethigs.

1. Do you have enabled swap?
2. Do you enable CONFIG_COMPACTION?
3. Could we get your zoneinfo via cat /proc/zoneinfo?
4. If you disabled watchdog thread, you could see OOM sometime
   although it takes very long time?


> 
> Best Regards
> Lisa Du
> 

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-01  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-23  4:58 Possible deadloop in direct reclaim? Lisa Du
2013-07-23 20:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-07-24  1:21   ` Lisa Du
2013-07-25 18:19     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-07-26  1:11       ` Lisa Du
2013-07-29 16:44         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-07-30  1:27           ` Lisa Du
2013-08-01  2:24           ` Lisa Du
2013-08-01  2:45             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-08-01  4:21               ` Bob Liu
2013-08-03 21:22                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-08-04 23:50                   ` Minchan Kim
2013-08-01  5:19               ` Lisa Du
2013-08-01  8:56                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-02  1:18                   ` Lisa Du
2013-07-29  1:32       ` Lisa Du
2013-07-24  1:18 ` Bob Liu
2013-07-24  1:31   ` Lisa Du
2013-07-24  2:23   ` Lisa Du
2013-07-24  3:38     ` Bob Liu
2013-07-24  5:58       ` Lisa Du
2013-07-25 18:14   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-07-26  1:22     ` Bob Liu
2013-07-29 16:46       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-08-01  5:43 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2013-08-01  6:13   ` Lisa Du
2013-08-01  7:33     ` Minchan Kim
2013-08-01  8:20       ` Lisa Du
2013-08-01  8:42         ` Minchan Kim
2013-08-02  1:03           ` Lisa Du
2013-08-02  2:26           ` Minchan Kim
2013-08-02  2:33             ` Minchan Kim
2013-08-02  3:17             ` Lisa Du
2013-08-02  3:53               ` Minchan Kim
2013-08-02  8:08                 ` Lisa Du
2013-08-04 23:47                   ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130801054338.GD19540@bbox \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=cldu@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).