linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>, Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: readahead: make context readahead more conservative
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 16:54:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130808085418.GA23970@localhost> (raw)

This helps performance on moderately dense random reads on SSD.

Transaction-Per-Second numbers provided by Taobao:

		QPS	case
		-------------------------------------------------------
		7536	disable context readahead totally
w/ patch:	7129	slower size rampup and start RA on the 3rd read
		6717	slower size rampup
w/o patch:	5581	unmodified context readahead

Before, readahead will be started whenever reading page N+1 when it
happen to read N recently. After patch, we'll only start readahead
when *three* random reads happen to access pages N, N+1, N+2. The
probability of this happening is extremely low for pure random reads,
unless they are very dense, which actually deserves some readahead.

Also start with a smaller readahead window. The impact to interleaved
sequential reads should be small, because for a long run stream, the
the small readahead window rampup phase is negletable.

The context readahead actually benefits clustered random reads on HDD
whose seek cost is pretty high. However as SSD is increasingly used
for random read workloads it's better for the context readahead to
concentrate on interleaved sequential reads.

Another SSD rand read test from Miao

        # file size:        2GB
        # read IO amount: 625MB
        sysbench --test=fileio          \
                --max-requests=10000    \
                --num-threads=1         \
                --file-num=1            \
                --file-block-size=64K   \
                --file-test-mode=rndrd  \
                --file-fsync-freq=0     \
                --file-fsync-end=off    run

shows the performance of btrfs grows up from 69MB/s to 121MB/s,
ext4 from 104MB/s to 121MB/s.

Tested-by: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
Tested-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
 mm/readahead.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- linux-next.orig/mm/readahead.c	2013-08-08 16:21:29.675286154 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/readahead.c	2013-08-08 16:21:33.851286019 +0800
@@ -371,10 +371,10 @@ static int try_context_readahead(struct
 	size = count_history_pages(mapping, ra, offset, max);
 
 	/*
-	 * no history pages:
+	 * not enough history pages:
 	 * it could be a random read
 	 */
-	if (!size)
+	if (size <= req_size)
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -385,8 +385,8 @@ static int try_context_readahead(struct
 		size *= 2;
 
 	ra->start = offset;
-	ra->size = get_init_ra_size(size + req_size, max);
-	ra->async_size = ra->size;
+	ra->size = min(size + req_size, max);
+	ra->async_size = 1;
 
 	return 1;
 }

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2013-08-08  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-08  8:54 Fengguang Wu [this message]
2013-08-19  1:59 ` readahead: make context readahead more conservative Miao Xie
2013-08-19  2:05   ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130808085418.GA23970@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tm@tao.ma \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).