From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: kswapd skips compaction if reclaim order drops to zero?
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 23:10:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130815141004.GD8437@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130815135627.GX2296@suse.de>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 02:56:27PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:41:39PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hey Mel,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:47:27AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 06:02:53PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > > > If the allocation order is not high, direct compaction does nothing.
> > > > Can we skip compaction here if order drops to zero?
> > > >
> > >
> > > If the allocation order is not high then
> > >
> > > pgdat_needs_compaction == (order > 0) == false == no calling compact_pdatt
> > >
> > > In the case where order is reset to 0 due to fragmentation then it does
> > > call compact_pgdat but it does no work due to the cc->order check in
> > > __compact_pgdat.
> > >
> >
> > I am looking at mmotm-2013-08-07-16-55 but couldn't find cc->order
> > check right before compact_zone in __comact_pgdat.
> > Could you pinpoint code piece?
> >
>
> Thanks, I screwed up as that check happens too late. However, it still
> ends up not mattering because it does this
>
> compact_pgdat
> -> __compact_pgdat
> -> compact_zone
> -> compaction_suitable
>
> For order == 0, compaction_suitable will return either COMPACT_SKIPPED
> (if the watermarks are not met) and COMPACT_PARTIAL otherwise. Either
> way, compaction doesn't run.
In compaction_suitable, it could pass first zone_watermark_ok
but failed second zone_watermark_ok while fragindex is -1000
so compaction could run.
And we shouldn't depend on such coincidence.
>
> --
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-15 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-15 10:02 kswapd skips compaction if reclaim order drops to zero? Hillf Danton
2013-08-15 10:47 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-15 13:41 ` Minchan Kim
2013-08-15 13:56 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-15 14:10 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2013-08-15 15:39 ` [PATCH] mm: compaction: Do not compact pgdat for order-0 Mel Gorman
2013-08-16 4:37 ` Minchan Kim
2013-08-16 0:25 ` kswapd skips compaction if reclaim order drops to zero? Wanpeng Li
2013-08-16 0:25 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130815141004.GD8437@gmail.com \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).