From: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [BUGFIX] drivers/base: fix show_mem_removable to handle missing sections
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:06:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130827160624.GA22918@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130826144959.52fd24cd2833929168ee7e35@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 02:49:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:23:17 -0500 Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> > "cat /sys/devices/system/memory/memory*/removable" crashed the system.
> >
> > The problem is that show_mem_removable() is passing a
> > bad pfn to is_mem_section_removable(), which causes
> > if (!node_online(page_to_nid(page))) to blow up.
> > Why is it passing in a bad pfn?
> >
> > show_mem_removable() will loop sections_per_block times.
> > sections_per_block is 16, but mem->section_count is 8,
> > indicating holes in this memory block. Checking that
> > the memory section is present before checking to see
> > if the memory section is removable fixes the problem.
>
> The patch textually applies to 3.10, 3.9 and perhaps earlier. Should
> it be applied to earlier kernels?
I believe so, since this does not appear to be a recent
regression, but have not verified the problem/fix in
earlier kernels.
Thanks,
--
Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead
SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc rja@sgi.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-27 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-23 16:23 [PATCH v2] [BUGFIX] drivers/base: fix show_mem_removable to handle missing sections Russ Anderson
2013-08-26 21:49 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-27 16:06 ` Russ Anderson [this message]
2013-08-26 23:49 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130827160624.GA22918@sgi.com \
--to=rja@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).