From: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"iamjoonsoo.kim" <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 3/4] mm/vmalloc: revert "mm/vmalloc.c: check VM_UNINITIALIZED flag in s_show instead of show_numa_info"
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:06:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130917060637.GA19793@hacker.(null)> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHGf_=oqB-WfYansyoGb3E+Rs9z4aK2N7+m8jTyobgRUoD=LpA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi KOSAKI,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 01:44:04AM -0400, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Hi KOSAKI,
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:23:32PM -0400, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>>On 9/14/2013 7:45 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>> Changelog:
>>>> *v2 -> v3: revert commit d157a558 directly
>>>>
>>>> The VM_UNINITIALIZED/VM_UNLIST flag introduced by commit f5252e00(mm: avoid
>>>> null pointer access in vm_struct via /proc/vmallocinfo) is used to avoid
>>>> accessing the pages field with unallocated page when show_numa_info() is
>>>> called. This patch move the check just before show_numa_info in order that
>>>> some messages still can be dumped via /proc/vmallocinfo. This patch revert
>>>> commit d157a558 (mm/vmalloc.c: check VM_UNINITIALIZED flag in s_show instead
>>>> of show_numa_info);
>>>
>>>Both d157a558 and your patch don't explain why your one is better. Yes, some
>>>messages _can_ be dumped. But why should we do so?
>>
>> More messages can be dumped and original commit f5252e00(mm: avoid null pointer
>> access in vm_struct via /proc/vmallocinfo) do that.
>>
>>>And No. __get_vm_area_node() doesn't use __GFP_ZERO for allocating vm_area_struct.
>>>dumped partial dump is not only partial, but also may be garbage.
>>
>> vm_struct is allocated by kzalloc_node.
>
>Oops, you are right. Then, your code _intentionally_ show amazing
>zero. Heh, nice.
>More message is pointless. zero is just zero. It doesn't have any information.
>
After PATCH 4/4 applied, there is a check:
if (!(va->flags & VM_VM_AREA))
return 0;
- show vm_struct information between insert_vmap_area and setup_vmalloc_vm.
Nothing will be dumped since the check mentioned above.
- show vm_struct information between setup_vmalloc_vm and vm_struct
fully populated.
The fields initialized in setup_vmalloc_vm will be dumped correctly and
other uninitialized fields of vm_struct won't be dumped instead of dump
zero as you mentioned since there is check like v->caller, v->nr_pages
in s_show.
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
>
>>>I wonder why we need to call setup_vmalloc_vm() _after_ insert_vmap_area.
>>
>> I think it's another topic.
>
>Why?
>
>
>> Fill vm_struct and set VM_VM_AREA flag. If I misunderstand your
>> question?
>
>VM_VM_AREA doesn't help. we have race between insert_vmap_area and
>setup_vmalloc_vm.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-17 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-14 23:45 [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] mm/vmalloc: don't set area->caller twice Wanpeng Li
2013-09-14 23:45 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 2/4] mm/vmalloc: revert "mm/vmalloc.c: emit the failure message before return" Wanpeng Li
2013-09-16 20:15 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-09-16 23:41 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-09-16 23:41 ` Wanpeng Li
[not found] ` <5237971b.4c19310a.2b36.7d41SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-09-17 5:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-09-17 6:28 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-09-17 6:28 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-09-14 23:45 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 3/4] mm/vmalloc: revert "mm/vmalloc.c: check VM_UNINITIALIZED flag in s_show instead of show_numa_info" Wanpeng Li
2013-09-16 21:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-09-17 0:18 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-09-17 0:18 ` Wanpeng Li
[not found] ` <52379fe8.c250e00a.63fd.ffff8ccdSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-09-17 5:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-09-17 6:06 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-09-17 6:06 ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2013-09-14 23:45 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] mm/vmalloc: fix show vmap_area information race with vmap_area tear down Wanpeng Li
2013-09-16 21:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-09-16 23:25 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-09-16 23:25 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-09-16 19:52 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] mm/vmalloc: don't set area->caller twice KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-09-16 23:29 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-09-16 23:29 ` Wanpeng Li
[not found] ` <5237946f.4815440a.094e.ffff8c29SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-09-23 23:18 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-24 0:01 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='20130917060637.GA19793@hacker.(null)' \
--to=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).