From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-f50.google.com (mail-oa0-f50.google.com [209.85.219.50]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BFC6B0031 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:30:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id j1so924800oag.23 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from /spool/local by e33.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:11:56 -0600 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C701FF0062 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:11:13 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (d03av06.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.245]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r8NHAfMd196412 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:10:42 -0600 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r8NHCJHB018254 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:12:20 -0600 Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:04:00 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH] hotplug: Optimize {get,put}_online_cpus() Message-ID: <20130923170400.GA1390@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20130917143003.GA29354@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130917162050.GK22421@suse.de> <20130917164505.GG12926@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130918154939.GZ26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130919143241.GB26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130923105017.030e0aef@gandalf.local.home> <20130923145446.GX9326@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130923111303.04b99db8@gandalf.local.home> <20130923155059.GO9093@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130923160130.GC9326@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130923160130.GC9326@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Steven Rostedt , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Srikar Dronamraju , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Linux-MM , LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Thomas Gleixner On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 06:01:30PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 08:50:59AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Not a problem, just stuff the idx into some per-task thing. Either > > task_struct or taskinfo will work fine. > > Still not seeing the point of using srcu though.. > > srcu_read_lock() vs synchronize_srcu() is the same but far more > expensive than preempt_disable() vs synchronize_sched(). Heh! You want the old-style SRCU. ;-) > > Or to put it another way, if the underlying slow-path mutex is > > reader-preference, then the whole thing will be reader-preference. > > Right, so 1) we have no such mutex so we're going to have to open-code > that anyway, and 2) like I just explained in the other email, I want the > pending writer case to be _fast_ as well. At some point I suspect that we will want some form of fairness, but in the meantime, good point. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org