From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] frontswap: enable call to invalidate area on swapoff
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:03:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131007150338.1fdee18b536bb1d9fe41a07b@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381159541-13981-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
On Mon, 07 Oct 2013 17:25:41 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> During swapoff the frontswap_map was NULL-ified before calling
> frontswap_invalidate_area(). However the frontswap_invalidate_area()
> exits early if frontswap_map is NULL. Invalidate was never called during
> swapoff.
>
> This patch moves frontswap_map_set() in swapoff just after calling
> frontswap_invalidate_area() so outside of locks
> (swap_lock and swap_info_struct->lock). This shouldn't be a problem as
> during swapon the frontswap_map_set() is called also outside of any
> locks.
>
Ahem. So there's a bunch of code in __frontswap_invalidate_area()
which hasn't ever been executed and nobody noticed it. So perhaps that
code isn't actually needed?
More seriously, this patch looks like it enables code which hasn't been
used or tested before. How well tested was this?
Are there any runtime-visible effects from this change?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-07 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-07 15:25 [PATCH] frontswap: enable call to invalidate area on swapoff Krzysztof Kozlowski
2013-10-07 15:37 ` Seth Jennings
2013-10-07 22:03 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-10-08 8:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2013-10-08 20:08 ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-09 7:50 ` Bob Liu
2013-10-09 14:40 ` Seth Jennings
2013-10-10 1:29 ` Bob Liu
2013-10-10 2:26 ` Seth Jennings
2013-10-11 2:23 ` Weijie Yang
2013-10-11 9:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2013-10-11 9:42 ` Weijie Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131007150338.1fdee18b536bb1d9fe41a07b@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=shli@fusionio.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).