From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com (mail-pd0-f171.google.com [209.85.192.171]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293996B0037 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 17:21:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f171.google.com with SMTP id g10so7722166pdj.16 for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 14:21:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id o14so6067747lbi.18 for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 14:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 01:21:33 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] smaps: show VM_SOFTDIRTY flag in VmFlags line Message-ID: <20131007212133.GL6036@moon> References: <1380913335-17466-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> <5252B56C.8030903@parallels.com> <1381155304-2ro6e10t-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1381155304-2ro6e10t-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Naoya Horiguchi Cc: Pavel Emelyanov , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Wu Fengguang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:15:04AM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > > > The comment is not correct. Per-VMA soft-dirty flag means, that > > VMA is "newly created" one and thus represents a new (dirty) are > > in task's VM. > > Thanks for the correction. I changed the description. Looks good to me, thanks! Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org