From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com (mail-pd0-f175.google.com [209.85.192.175]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789096B0031 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:02:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q10so9198830pdj.34 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id gx14so7546578lab.9 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 00:02:24 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Soft dirty tracking fixes Message-ID: <20131008200224.GB19040@moon> References: <20131008090019.527108154@gmail.com> <20131008125013.85dcccf418260d43b6cb120a@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131008125013.85dcccf418260d43b6cb120a@linux-foundation.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:50:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Do you consider the problems which patches 1 and 2 address to be > sufficiently serious to justify backporting into -stable? Good question! Yeah, since dirty bit traking is in 3.11 already, it would be great to merge these two patches into -stable. Should I resend them with stable team CC'ed? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org