linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	UML devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:16:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131011011649.GA11191@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5256DA9A.5060904@gmx.de>

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 06:49:30PM +0200, Toralf FA?rster wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 12:33 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am 09.10.2013 23:47, schrieb Jan Kara:
> >> On Wed 09-10-13 20:43:50, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>> CC'ing mm folks.
> >>> Please see below.
> >>   Added Fenguang to CC since he is the author of this code.
> > 
> > Thx, get_maintainer.pl didn't list him.
> > 
> >>> Am 09.10.2013 19:26, schrieb Toralf FA?rster:
> >>>> On 10/08/2013 10:07 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Toralf FA?rster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hmm, now pages_dirtied is zero, according to the backtrace, but the BUG_ON()
> >>>>>>> asserts its strict positive?!?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Can you please try the following instead of the BUG_ON():
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> if (pause < 0) {
> >>>>>>>         printk("pages_dirtied = %lu\n", pages_dirtied);
> >>>>>>>         printk("task_ratelimit = %lu\n", task_ratelimit);
> >>>>>>>         printk("pause = %ld\n", pause);
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>                         Geert
> >>>>>> I tried it in different ways already - I'm completely unsuccessful in getting any printk output.
> >>>>>> As soon as the issue happens I do have a
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [trinity-child0:1521]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> at stderr of the UML and then no further input is accepted. With uml_mconsole I'm however able
> >>>>>> to run very basic commands like a crash dump, sysrq ond so on.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You may get an idea of the magnitude of pages_dirtied by using a chain of
> >>>>> BUG_ON()s, like:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 2000000000);
> >>>>> BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 1000000000);
> >>>>> BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 100000000);
> >>>>> BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 10000000);
> >>>>> BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 1000000);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Probably 1 million is already too much for normal operation?
> >>>>>
> >>>> period = HZ * pages_dirtied / task_ratelimit;
> >>>> 		BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 2000000000);
> >>>> 		BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 1000000000);      <-------------- this is line 1467
> >>>
> >>> Summary for mm people:
> >>>
> >>> Toralf runs trinty on UML/i386.
> >>> After some time pages_dirtied becomes very large.
> >>> More than 1000000000 pages in this case.
> >>   Huh, this is really strange. pages_dirtied is passed into
> >> balance_dirty_pages() from current->nr_dirtied. So I wonder how a value
> >> over 10^9 can get there. After all that is over 4TB so I somewhat doubt the
> >> task was ever able to dirty that much during its lifetime (but correct me
> >> if I'm wrong here, with UML and memory backed disks it is not totally
> >> impossible)... I went through the logic of handling ->nr_dirtied but
> >> I didn't find any obvious problem there. Hum, maybe one thing - what
> >> 'task_ratelimit' values do you see in balance_dirty_pages? If that one was
> >> huge, we could possibly accumulate huge current->nr_dirtied.
> > 
> > Toralf, you can try a snipplet like this one to get the values printed out:
> > diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > index f5236f8..a80e520 100644
> > --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> > +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > @@ -1463,6 +1463,12 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> >                         goto pause;
> >                 }
> >                 period = HZ * pages_dirtied / task_ratelimit;
> > +
> > +               {
> > +                       extern int printf(char *, ...);
> > +                       printf("---> task_ratelimit: %lu\n", task_ratelimit);
> > +               }
> > +
> >                 pause = period;
> >                 if (current->dirty_paused_when)
> >                         pause -= now - current->dirty_paused_when;
> > 
> > 
> > Yes, printf(), not printk().
> > Using this hack we print directly to host's stdout. :)
> > 
> *head smack* ofc - works fine.
> So given this diff :
> 
> iff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index f5236f8..5a2c337 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -1464,6 +1464,13 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
>                 }
>                 period = HZ * pages_dirtied / task_ratelimit;
>                 pause = period;
> +               if (pause < 0)  {
> +                       extern int printf(char *, ...);
> +                       printf("overflow : pause : %li\n", pause);
> +                       printf("overflow : pages_dirtied : %lu\n", pages_dirtied);
> +                       printf("overflow :  task_ratelimit: %lu\n", task_ratelimit);
> +                       BUG_ON(1);
> +               }
>                 if (current->dirty_paused_when)
>                         pause -= now - current->dirty_paused_when;
>                 /*
> @@ -1503,6 +1510,13 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
>                 }
> 
>  pause:
> +               if (pause < 0)  {

Oops, we got 

        ick : pause : -984

here! Since pause is bounded by [min_pause, max_pause], it means
something goes wrong with the bounds. Would you help print min_pause
and max_pause as well?

It seems there are "long <=> unsigned long" conversion problems in
bdi_max_pause(), which might make max_pause a negative number. And the
min_pause calculation is based on max_pause to some degree..

Thanks,
Fengguang

> +                       extern int printf(char *, ...);
> +                       printf("ick : pause : %li\n", pause);
> +                       printf("ick: pages_dirtied : %lu\n", pages_dirtied);
> +                       printf("ick: task_ratelimit: %lu\n", task_ratelimit);
> +                       BUG_ON(1);
> +               }
>                 trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,
>                                           dirty_thresh,
>                                           background_thresh,
> 
> 
> I got this :
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  * Starting local
> net.core.warnings = 0                                                                                                                            [ ok ]
> ick : pause : -984
>                   ick: pages_dirtied : 0
>                                         ick: task_ratelimit: 0
>                                                               Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG!
> CPU: 0 PID: 1434 Comm: trinity-child2 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc4-00029-g0e7a3ed-dirty #12
> 47397c84 47397cb0 0841b5a0 084c30e8 085f76e0 084b4745 47397cbc 00000000 
>        fffffc28 01fff278 085cb4a0 47397d2c 0841c5a0 084b4745 084c5398 000005ee 
>        08432cf0 43e47600 471757f8 47397cf0 ffffff0c 47397cdc 5256d8b9 3417ec18 47397c5c:  [<08060b2c>] show_stack+0x7c/0xd0
> 47397c7c:  [<0841e34d>] dump_stack+0x26/0x28
> 47397c8c:  [<0841b5a0>] panic+0x7a/0x180
> 47397cb4:  [<0841c5a0>] balance_dirty_pages.isra.32+0x4e3/0x5ad
> 47397d30:  [<080d3595>] balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited+0xf5/0x100
> 47397d44:  [<080e4a3f>] __do_fault+0x3cf/0x440
> 47397d9c:  [<080e6e0f>] handle_mm_fault+0xef/0x7c0
> 47397dec:  [<080e7817>] __get_user_pages+0x227/0x420
> 47397e24:  [<080e7ae3>] get_user_pages+0x63/0x70
> 47397e4c:  [<08143dc6>] SyS_io_setup+0x3c6/0x760
> 47397eb0:  [<08062984>] handle_syscall+0x64/0x80
> 47397ef0:  [<08074fb5>] userspace+0x475/0x5f0
> 47397fec:  [<0805f750>] fork_handler+0x60/0x70
> 47397ffc:  [<00000000>] 0x0
> 
> 
> EIP: 0073:[<40001282>] CPU: 0 Not tainted ESP: 007b:bfb348f8 EFLAGS: 00000246
>     Not tainted
> EAX: ffffffda EBX: 00001000 ECX: 080d0000 EDX: 80000048
> ESI: 80fbff1f EDI: ffe02f77 EBP: 90f6e2a3 DS: 007b ES: 007b
> 47397c0c:  [<0807947f>] show_regs+0x10f/0x120
> 47397c28:  [<080623a9>] panic_exit+0x29/0x50
> 47397c38:  [<0809ba86>] notifier_call_chain+0x36/0x60
> 47397c60:  [<0809bba1>] __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x21/0x30
> 47397c70:  [<0809bbdf>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x2f/0x40
> 47397c8c:  [<0841b5bc>] panic+0x96/0x180
> 47397cb4:  [<0841c5a0>] balance_dirty_pages.isra.32+0x4e3/0x5ad
> 47397d30:  [<080d3595>] balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited+0xf5/0x100
> 47397d44:  [<080e4a3f>] __do_fault+0x3cf/0x440
> 47397d9c:  [<080e6e0f>] handle_mm_fault+0xef/0x7c0
> 47397dec:  [<080e7817>] __get_user_pages+0x227/0x420
> 47397e24:  [<080e7ae3>] get_user_pages+0x63/0x70
> 47397e4c:  [<08143dc6>] SyS_io_setup+0x3c6/0x760
> 47397eb0:  [<08062984>] handle_syscall+0x64/0x80
> 47397ef0:  [<08074fb5>] userspace+0x475/0x5f0
> 47397fec:  [<0805f750>] fork_handler+0x60/0x70
> 47397ffc:  [<00000000>] 0x0
> 
> /home/tfoerste/workspace/bin/start_uml.sh: line 115: 18718 Aborted                 (core dumped) $LINUX earlyprintk ubda=$ROOTFS ubdb=$SWAP eth0=$NET mem=$MEM $TTY umid=uml_$NAME rootfstype=ext4 "$ARGS"
> 
> 
> >From what I see there are 2 different types of issues - and this is an example of the other of both 
> 
> > Thanks,
> > //richard
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> MfG/Sincerely
> Toralf FA?rster
> pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-11  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <524C6643.2040209@gmx.de>
     [not found] ` <CAFLxGvwiH7L4oAW8tw6FyeGczg+rKjUDCdkLKdegy9yX==2cMA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <524DBD5D.1040203@gmx.de>
     [not found]     ` <524DBFBB.1050002@nod.at>
     [not found]       ` <524DC278.3020106@gmx.de>
     [not found]         ` <524DC394.6030406@nod.at>
     [not found]           ` <524DC675.4020201@gmx.de>
     [not found]             ` <524E57BA.805@nod.at>
     [not found]               ` <52517109.90605@gmx.de>
     [not found]                 ` <CAMuHMdXrU0e_6AxvdboMkDs+N+tSWD+b8ou92j28c0vsq2eQQA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                   ` <5251C334.3010604@gmx.de>
     [not found]                     ` <CAMuHMdUo8dSd4s3089ZDEc485wL1sFxBKLeaExJuqNiQY+S-Lw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                       ` <5251CF94.5040101@gmx.de>
     [not found]                         ` <CAMuHMdWs6Y7y12STJ+YXKJjxRF0k5yU9C9+0fiPPmq-GgeW-6Q@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                           ` <525591AD.4060401@gmx.de>
2013-10-09 18:43                             ` [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image Richard Weinberger
2013-10-09 21:47                               ` Jan Kara
2013-10-09 22:33                                 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-10-10 16:49                                   ` Toralf Förster
2013-10-11  1:16                                     ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2013-10-11  8:42                                       ` Toralf Förster
2013-10-11  8:57                                         ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-11  9:05                                           ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-11 14:12                                           ` Toralf Förster
2013-10-12  0:43                                             ` [PATCH] writeback: fix negative bdi max pause Fengguang Wu
2013-10-12  4:45                                             ` [PATCH v2] " Fengguang Wu
2013-10-14 12:34                                               ` Jan Kara
2013-10-10  2:46                                 ` [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image Fengguang Wu
2013-10-10  6:52                                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-10-10  7:03                                     ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131011011649.GA11191@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).