linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"UML devel" <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v2] writeback: fix negative bdi max pause
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:45:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131012044517.GA32048@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52580767.6090604@gmx.de>

Toralf runs trinity on UML/i386.
After some time it hangs and the last message line is

	BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [trinity-child0:1521]

It's found that pages_dirtied becomes very large.
More than 1000000000 pages in this case:

	period = HZ * pages_dirtied / task_ratelimit;
	BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 2000000000);
	BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 1000000000);      <---------

UML debug printf shows that we got negative pause here:

	ick: pause : -984
	ick: pages_dirtied : 0
	ick: task_ratelimit: 0

	 pause:
	+       if (pause < 0)  {
	+               extern int printf(char *, ...);
	+               printf("ick : pause : %li\n", pause);
	+               printf("ick: pages_dirtied : %lu\n", pages_dirtied);
	+               printf("ick: task_ratelimit: %lu\n", task_ratelimit);
	+               BUG_ON(1);
	+       }
	        trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,

Since pause is bounded by [min_pause, max_pause] where min_pause is also
bounded by max_pause. It's suspected and demonstrated that the max_pause
calculation goes wrong:

	ick: pause : -717
	ick: min_pause : -177
	ick: max_pause : -717
	ick: pages_dirtied : 14
	ick: task_ratelimit: 0

The problem lies in the two "long = unsigned long" assignments in
bdi_max_pause() which might go negative if the highest bit is 1, and
the min_t(long, ...) check failed to protect it falling under 0. Fix
all of them by using "unsigned long" throughout the function.

Reported-by: Toralf FA?rster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
Tested-by: Toralf FA?rster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
 mm/page-writeback.c |   10 +++++-----
 mm/readahead.c      |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

 Changes since v1: Add CC list.

diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 3f0c895..241a746 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -1104,11 +1104,11 @@ static unsigned long dirty_poll_interval(unsigned long dirty,
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static long bdi_max_pause(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
-			  unsigned long bdi_dirty)
+static unsigned long bdi_max_pause(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
+				   unsigned long bdi_dirty)
 {
-	long bw = bdi->avg_write_bandwidth;
-	long t;
+	unsigned long bw = bdi->avg_write_bandwidth;
+	unsigned long t;
 
 	/*
 	 * Limit pause time for small memory systems. If sleeping for too long
@@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@ static long bdi_max_pause(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
 	t = bdi_dirty / (1 + bw / roundup_pow_of_two(1 + HZ / 8));
 	t++;
 
-	return min_t(long, t, MAX_PAUSE);
+	return min_t(unsigned long, t, MAX_PAUSE);
 }
 
 static long bdi_min_pause(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-12  4:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <524C6643.2040209@gmx.de>
     [not found] ` <CAFLxGvwiH7L4oAW8tw6FyeGczg+rKjUDCdkLKdegy9yX==2cMA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <524DBD5D.1040203@gmx.de>
     [not found]     ` <524DBFBB.1050002@nod.at>
     [not found]       ` <524DC278.3020106@gmx.de>
     [not found]         ` <524DC394.6030406@nod.at>
     [not found]           ` <524DC675.4020201@gmx.de>
     [not found]             ` <524E57BA.805@nod.at>
     [not found]               ` <52517109.90605@gmx.de>
     [not found]                 ` <CAMuHMdXrU0e_6AxvdboMkDs+N+tSWD+b8ou92j28c0vsq2eQQA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                   ` <5251C334.3010604@gmx.de>
     [not found]                     ` <CAMuHMdUo8dSd4s3089ZDEc485wL1sFxBKLeaExJuqNiQY+S-Lw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                       ` <5251CF94.5040101@gmx.de>
     [not found]                         ` <CAMuHMdWs6Y7y12STJ+YXKJjxRF0k5yU9C9+0fiPPmq-GgeW-6Q@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                           ` <525591AD.4060401@gmx.de>
2013-10-09 18:43                             ` [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image Richard Weinberger
2013-10-09 21:47                               ` Jan Kara
2013-10-09 22:33                                 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-10-10 16:49                                   ` Toralf Förster
2013-10-11  1:16                                     ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-11  8:42                                       ` Toralf Förster
2013-10-11  8:57                                         ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-11  9:05                                           ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-11 14:12                                           ` Toralf Förster
2013-10-12  0:43                                             ` [PATCH] writeback: fix negative bdi max pause Fengguang Wu
2013-10-12  4:45                                             ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2013-10-14 12:34                                               ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Kara
2013-10-10  2:46                                 ` [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image Fengguang Wu
2013-10-10  6:52                                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-10-10  7:03                                     ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131012044517.GA32048@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).