linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	handai.szj@taobao.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu counter: cast this_cpu_sub() adjustment
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131027112255.GB14934@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382859876-28196-3-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com>

On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:44:35AM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> this_cpu_sub() is implemented as negation and addition.
> 
> This patch casts the adjustment to the counter type before negation to
> sign extend the adjustment.  This helps in cases where the counter
> type is wider than an unsigned adjustment.  An alternative to this
> patch is to declare such operations unsupported, but it seemed useful
> to avoid surprises.
> 
> This patch specifically helps the following example:
>   unsigned int delta = 1
>   preempt_disable()
>   this_cpu_write(long_counter, 0)
>   this_cpu_sub(long_counter, delta)
>   preempt_enable()
> 
> Before this change long_counter on a 64 bit machine ends with value
> 0xffffffff, rather than 0xffffffffffffffff.  This is because
> this_cpu_sub(pcp, delta) boils down to this_cpu_add(pcp, -delta),
> which is basically:
>   long_counter = 0 + 0xffffffff
> 
> Also apply the same cast to:
>   __this_cpu_sub()
>   this_cpu_sub_return()
>   and __this_cpu_sub_return()
> 
> All percpu_test.ko passes, especially the following cases which
> previously failed:
> 
>   l -= ui_one;
>   __this_cpu_sub(long_counter, ui_one);
>   CHECK(l, long_counter, -1);
> 
>   l -= ui_one;
>   this_cpu_sub(long_counter, ui_one);
>   CHECK(l, long_counter, -1);
>   CHECK(l, long_counter, 0xffffffffffffffff);
> 
>   ul -= ui_one;
>   __this_cpu_sub(ulong_counter, ui_one);
>   CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, -1);
>   CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, 0xffffffffffffffff);
> 
>   ul = this_cpu_sub_return(ulong_counter, ui_one);
>   CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, 2);
> 
>   ul = __this_cpu_sub_return(ulong_counter, ui_one);
>   CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, 1);
> 
> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>

Ouch, nice catch.

 Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

We probably want to cc stable for this and the next one.  How should
these be routed?  I can take these through percpu tree or mm works
too.  Either way, it'd be best to route them together.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-27 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-27  7:44 [PATCH 0/3] fix unsigned pcp adjustments Greg Thelen
2013-10-27  7:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] percpu counter: test module Greg Thelen
2013-10-27 11:18   ` Tejun Heo
2013-10-27  7:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] percpu counter: cast this_cpu_sub() adjustment Greg Thelen
2013-10-27 11:22   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-10-27 12:04     ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-27 13:00       ` Tejun Heo
2013-10-27 16:13         ` Greg Thelen
2013-10-27 17:12   ` Greg Thelen
2013-10-27  7:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] memcg: use __this_cpu_sub to decrement stats Greg Thelen
2013-10-27 11:24   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131027112255.GB14934@mtj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=handai.szj@taobao.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).