linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mm: compaction: do not mark unmovable pageblocks as skipped in async compaction
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:58:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131126105815.GI5285@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385389570-11393-5-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz>

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 03:26:09PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Compaction temporarily marks pageblocks where it fails to isolate pages as
> to-be-skipped in further compactions, in order to improve efficiency. One of
> the reasons to fail isolating pages is that isolation is not attempted in
> pageblocks that are not of MIGRATE_MOVABLE (or CMA) type.
> 
> The problem is that blocks skipped due to not being MIGRATE_MOVABLE in async
> compaction become skipped due to the temporary mark also in future sync
> compaction. Moreover, this may follow quite soon during __alloc_page_slowpath,
> without much time for kswapd to clear the pageblock skip marks. This goes
> against the idea that sync compaction should try to scan these blocks more
> thoroughly than the async compaction.
> 
> The fix is to ensure in async compaction that these !MIGRATE_MOVABLE blocks are
> not marked to be skipped. Note this should not affect performance or locking
> impact of further async compactions, as skipping a block due to being
> !MIGRATE_MOVABLE is done soon after skipping a block marked to be skipped, both
> without locking.
> 
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
>  mm/compaction.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 0702bdf..f481193 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -455,6 +455,8 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	bool locked = false;
>  	struct page *page = NULL, *valid_page = NULL;
> +	bool skipped_unmovable = false;
> +
>  

whitespace damage.

>  	/*
>  	 * Ensure that there are not too many pages isolated from the LRU
> @@ -530,6 +532,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>  		if (!cc->sync && last_pageblock_nr != pageblock_nr &&
>  		    !migrate_async_suitable(get_pageblock_migratetype(page))) {
>  			cc->finished_update_migrate = true;
> +			skipped_unmovable = true;
>  			goto next_pageblock;
>  		}
>  

Minor nitpick, but it's also unreclaimable and isolate blocks that are
being skipped here. If you do another revision, consider rephrasing
s/unmovable/unsuitable/ where appropriate. It's fairly obvious from
context so if you decide not to, that's fine too.

> @@ -624,7 +627,7 @@ next_pageblock:
>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
>  
>  	/* Update the pageblock-skip if the whole pageblock was scanned */
> -	if (low_pfn == end_pfn)
> +	if (low_pfn == end_pfn && !skipped_unmovable)
>  		update_pageblock_skip(cc, valid_page, nr_isolated, true);
>  

This comment is now out of date. If the comment gets updated then feel
free to add

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-26 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-25 14:26 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Memory compaction efficiency improvements Vlastimil Babka
2013-11-25 14:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: compaction: encapsulate defer reset logic Vlastimil Babka
2013-11-25 22:08   ` Rik van Riel
2013-11-26 10:16   ` Mel Gorman
2013-11-25 14:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: compaction: reset cached scanner pfn's before reading them Vlastimil Babka
2013-11-26 10:23   ` Mel Gorman
2013-11-26 13:16   ` Rik van Riel
2013-11-25 14:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: compaction: detect when scanners meet in isolate_freepages Vlastimil Babka
2013-11-26 10:45   ` Mel Gorman
2013-11-26 16:44     ` Vlastimil Babka
2013-11-25 14:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: compaction: do not mark unmovable pageblocks as skipped in async compaction Vlastimil Babka
2013-11-26 10:58   ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2013-11-25 14:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: compaction: reset scanner positions immediately when they meet Vlastimil Babka
2013-11-26 11:03   ` Mel Gorman
2013-12-04 14:30 ` [PATCH] mm: compaction: Trace compaction begin and end Mel Gorman
2013-12-04 14:51   ` Vlastimil Babka
2013-12-05  9:05     ` Mel Gorman
2013-12-06  9:50       ` Vlastimil Babka
2013-12-05  9:07     ` [PATCH] mm: compaction: Trace compaction begin and end v2 Mel Gorman
2013-12-06  9:50       ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131126105815.GI5285@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).