From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79556B0031 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:46:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id ey16so1889992wid.1 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 03:46:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (caramon.arm.linux.org.uk. [78.32.30.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id mu3si10474428wic.15.2013.11.27.03.46.11 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Nov 2013 03:46:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:39:39 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: netfilter: active obj WARN when cleaning up Message-ID: <20131127113939.GL16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <522B25B5.6000808@oracle.com> <5294F27D.4000108@oracle.com> <20131126230709.GA10948@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , Sasha Levin , Patrick McHardy , kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, "David S. Miller" , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , Greg KH On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:45:17AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:11:57PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > Ping? I still see this warning. > > > > Did your test include patch 0c3c6c00c6? > > And how is that patch supposed to help? > > > > >[ 418.312449] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 4178 at lib/debugobjects.c:260 debug_print_object+0x8d/0xb0() > > > >[ 418.313243] ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint: > > > >delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x20 > > > > >[ 418.321101] [] kmem_cache_free+0x197/0x340 > > > >[ 418.321101] [] kmem_cache_destroy+0x86/0xe0 > > > >[ 418.321101] [] nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list+0x131/0x170 > > The debug code detects an active timer, which itself is part of a > delayed work struct. The call comes from kmem_cache_destroy(). > > kmem_cache_free(kmem_cache, s); > > So debug object says: s contains an active timer. s is the kmem_cache > which is destroyed from nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list. > > Now struct kmem_cache has in case of SLUB: > > struct kobject kobj; /* For sysfs */ > > and struct kobject has: > > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE > struct delayed_work release; > #endif > > So this is the thing you want to look at: > > commit c817a67ec (kobject: delayed kobject release: help find buggy > drivers) added that delayed work thing. > > I fear that does not work for kobjects which are embedded into > something else. No, kobjects embedded into something else have their lifetime determined by the embedded kobject. That's rule #1 of kobjects - or rather reference counted objects. The point at which the kobject gets destructed is when the release function is called. If it is destructed before that time, that's a violation of the reference counted nature of kobjects, and that's what the delay on releasing is designed to catch. It's designed to catch code which does this exact path: put(obj) free(obj) rather than code which does it the right way: put(obj) -> refcount becomes 0 -> release function gets called ->free(obj) The former is unsafe because obj may have other references. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org