From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] mm/migrate: remove result argument on page allocation function for migration
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:47:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131211084719.GA2043@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00000142d83adfc7-81b70cc9-c87b-4e7e-bd98-0a97ee21db31-000000@email.amazonses.com>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:40:06PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > First, we don't use error number in fail case. Call-path related to
> > new_page_node() is shown in the following.
> >
> > do_move_page_to_node_array() -> migrate_pages() -> unmap_and_move()
> > -> new_page_node()
> >
> > If unmap_and_move() failed, migrate_pages() also returns err, and then
> > do_move_page_to_node_array() skips to set page's status to user buffer.
> > So we don't need to set error number to each pages on failure case.
>
> I dont get this. new_page_node() sets the error condition in the
> page_to_node array before this patch. There is no post processing in
> do_move_page_to_node_array(). The function simply returns and relies on
> new_page_node() to have set the page status. do_move_pages() then returns
> the page status back to userspace. How does the change preserve these
> diagnostics?
Hello, Christoph.
In do_move_pages(), if error occurs, 'goto out_pm' is executed and the
page status doesn't back to userspace. So we don't need to store err number.
Perhaps my description should be changed something like below.
*do_move_pages()* -> do_move_page_to_node_array() -> migrate_pages()
-> unmap_and_move() -> new_page_node()
If unmap_and_move() failed, migrate_pages() also returns err, and then
*do_move_pages()* skips to set page's status to user buffer.
So we don't need to set error number to each pages on failure case.
Is it sufficient explanation?
>
> > Next, we don't need to set node id of the new page in unmap_and_move(),
> > since it cannot be different with pm->node. In new_page_node(), we always
> > try to allocate the page in exact node by referencing pm->node. So it is
> > sufficient to set node id of the new page in new_page_node(), instead of
> > unmap_and_move().
>
> Thats a good thought.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-11 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-09 9:10 [PATCH v2 0/7] correct and clean-up migration related stuff Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-09 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm/migrate: add comment about permanent failure path Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-10 1:42 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-12-09 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm/migrate: correct failure handling if !hugepage_migration_support() Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-09 16:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-10 8:38 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-10 2:17 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-12-10 8:45 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-10 9:27 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-12-09 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm/mempolicy: correct putback method for isolate pages if failed Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-09 16:41 ` Rafael Aquini
2013-12-10 2:22 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-12-09 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mm/migrate: remove putback_lru_pages, fix comment on putback_movable_pages Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-10 2:33 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-12-10 8:51 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-10 9:00 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-09 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mm/compaction: respect ignore_skip_hint in update_pageblock_skip Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-10 2:50 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-12-09 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/migrate: remove unused function, fail_migrate_page() Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-09 16:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-09 17:07 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-12-10 2:36 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-12-09 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm/migrate: remove result argument on page allocation function for migration Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-09 16:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-10 3:22 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-12-11 8:47 ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2013-12-11 16:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-12 0:07 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131211084719.GA2043@lge.com \
--to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).