From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg, oom: lock mem_cgroup_print_oom_info
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:44:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131212084420.GA2630@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312111421320.7354@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Wed 11-12-13 14:23:18, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > mem_cgroup_print_oom_info uses a static buffer (memcg_name) to store the
> > name of the cgroup. This is not safe as pointed out by David Rientjes
> > because memcg oom is locked only for its hierarchy and nothing prevents
> > another parallel hierarchy to trigger oom as well and overwrite the
> > already in-use buffer.
> >
> > This patch introduces oom_info_lock hidden inside mem_cgroup_print_oom_info
> > which is held throughout the function. It make access to memcg_name safe
> > and as a bonus it also prevents parallel memcg ooms to interleave their
> > statistics which would make the printed data hard to analyze otherwise.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Thanks
>
> > ---
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 28c9221b74ea..c72b03bf9679 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -1647,13 +1647,13 @@ static void move_unlock_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > */
> > void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p)
> > {
> > - struct cgroup *task_cgrp;
> > - struct cgroup *mem_cgrp;
> > /*
> > - * Need a buffer in BSS, can't rely on allocations. The code relies
> > - * on the assumption that OOM is serialized for memory controller.
> > - * If this assumption is broken, revisit this code.
> > + * protects memcg_name and makes sure that parallel ooms do not
> > + * interleave
>
> Parallel memcg oom kills can happen in disjoint memcg hierarchies, this
> just prevents the printing of the statistics from interleaving. I'm not
> sure if that's clear from this comment.
What about this instead:
* Protects memcg_name and makes sure that ooms from parallel
* hierarchies do not interleave.
?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-12 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-11 15:42 [PATCH] memcg, oom: lock mem_cgroup_print_oom_info Michal Hocko
2013-12-11 22:23 ` David Rientjes
2013-12-12 8:44 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-12-12 23:31 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131212084420.GA2630@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).