From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4476B0068 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 02:00:50 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r10so1970666pdi.10 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:00:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from LGEMRELSE7Q.lge.com (LGEMRELSE7Q.lge.com. [156.147.1.151]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id vb7si806303pbc.2.2013.12.12.23.00.47 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:00:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:03:51 +0900 From: Joonsoo Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] slab: make more slab management structure off the slab Message-ID: <20131213070351.GD8845@lge.com> References: <1385974183-31423-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <1385974183-31423-6-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <00000142b3d18433-eacdc401-434f-42e1-8988-686bd15a3e20-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20131203021308.GE31168@lge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131203021308.GE31168@lge.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Pekka Enberg , Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , Wanpeng Li , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:13:08AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 02:58:41PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > > Now, the size of the freelist for the slab management diminish, > > > so that the on-slab management structure can waste large space > > > if the object of the slab is large. > > > > Hmmm.. That is confusing to me. "Since the size of the freelist has shrunk > > significantly we have to adjust the heuristic for making the on/off slab > > placement decision"? > > > > Make this clearer. > > Yes. your understanding is right. > I will replace above line with yours. > > Thanks. > > > > > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter Hello, Pekka. Below is updated patch for 5/5 in this series. Now I get acks from Christoph to all patches in this series. So, could you merge this patchset? :) If you want to resend wholeset with proper ack, I will do it with pleasure. Thanks. --------8<---------------