From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] memcg, slab: RCU protect memcg_params for root caches
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:28:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131219092836.GH9331@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be8f2fede0fbc45496c06f7bc6cc2272b9b81cc4.1387372122.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>
On Wed 18-12-13 17:16:57, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> We update root cache's memcg_params whenever we need to grow the
> memcg_caches array to accommodate all kmem-active memory cgroups.
> Currently we free the old version immediately then, which can lead to
> use-after-free, because the memcg_caches array is accessed lock-free.
> This patch fixes this by making memcg_params RCU-protected.
yes, I was thinking about something like this when talking about RCU
usage.
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> include/linux/slab.h | 5 ++++-
> mm/memcontrol.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> mm/slab.h | 8 +++++++-
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
> index 1e2f4fe..f7e5649 100644
> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> @@ -528,7 +528,10 @@ static __always_inline void *kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
> struct memcg_cache_params {
> bool is_root_cache;
> union {
> - struct kmem_cache *memcg_caches[0];
> + struct {
> + struct rcu_head rcu_head;
> + struct kmem_cache *memcg_caches[0];
> + };
> struct {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> struct list_head list;
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index ad8de6a..379fc5f 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3142,18 +3142,17 @@ int memcg_update_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_groups)
>
> if (num_groups > memcg_limited_groups_array_size) {
> int i;
> + struct memcg_cache_params *new_params;
> ssize_t size = memcg_caches_array_size(num_groups);
>
> size *= sizeof(void *);
> size += offsetof(struct memcg_cache_params, memcg_caches);
>
> - s->memcg_params = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!s->memcg_params) {
> - s->memcg_params = cur_params;
> + new_params = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!new_params)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - }
>
> - s->memcg_params->is_root_cache = true;
> + new_params->is_root_cache = true;
>
> /*
> * There is the chance it will be bigger than
> @@ -3167,7 +3166,7 @@ int memcg_update_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_groups)
> for (i = 0; i < memcg_limited_groups_array_size; i++) {
> if (!cur_params->memcg_caches[i])
> continue;
> - s->memcg_params->memcg_caches[i] =
> + new_params->memcg_caches[i] =
> cur_params->memcg_caches[i];
> }
>
> @@ -3180,7 +3179,9 @@ int memcg_update_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_groups)
> * bigger than the others. And all updates will reset this
> * anyway.
> */
> - kfree(cur_params);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(s->memcg_params, new_params);
> + if (cur_params)
> + kfree_rcu(cur_params, rcu_head);
> }
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index 1d8b53f..53b81a9 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -164,10 +164,16 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache *
> cache_from_memcg_idx(struct kmem_cache *s, int idx)
> {
> struct kmem_cache *cachep;
> + struct memcg_cache_params *params;
>
> if (!s->memcg_params)
> return NULL;
> - cachep = s->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx];
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + params = rcu_dereference(s->memcg_params);
> + cachep = params->memcg_caches[idx];
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
Consumer has to be covered by the same rcu section otherwise
memcg_params might be freed right after rcu unlock here.
> smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* see memcg_register_cache() */
> return cachep;
> }
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-19 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-18 13:16 [PATCH 1/6] slab: cleanup kmem_cache_create_memcg() Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] memcg, slab: kmem_cache_create_memcg(): free memcg params on error Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 17:06 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 6:32 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 8:48 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:01 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:19 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] memcg, slab: cleanup barrier usage when accessing memcg_caches Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 17:14 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 6:37 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:10 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:16 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:21 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:29 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:36 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:53 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] memcg, slab: check and init memcg_cahes under slab_mutex Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 17:41 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 7:07 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 8:00 ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-19 9:12 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:17 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:21 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] memcg: clear memcg_params after removing cache from memcg_slab_caches list Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] memcg, slab: RCU protect memcg_params for root caches Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:28 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-12-19 9:36 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:43 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:47 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 10:06 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-18 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] slab: cleanup kmem_cache_create_memcg() Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 6:31 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 8:44 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 8:51 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:16 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 7:27 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-12-19 8:17 ` [Devel] " Vasily Averin
2013-12-19 8:39 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:26 ` Vasily Averin
2013-12-19 9:42 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:45 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 10:23 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131219092836.GH9331@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).