From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFD16B0031 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:57:28 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hq4so15725445wib.1 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 06:57:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.parisc-linux.org (palinux.external.hp.com. [192.25.206.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fp3si11885482wic.22.2013.12.30.06.57.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Dec 2013 06:57:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 07:57:21 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fadvise: Directory level page cache cleaning support Message-ID: <20131230145720.GB20793@parisc-linux.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Li Wang Cc: Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Cong Wang , Zefan Li On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 09:45:15PM +0800, Li Wang wrote: > VFS relies on LRU-like page cache eviction algorithm Why is this a series of three patches? It just seems like you're trying to game the patch count statistics. One patch would have been fine for this tiny change. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org