linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Damien Ramonda <damien.ramonda@intel.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V5] mm readahead: Fix readahead fail for no local memory and limit readahead pages
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:51:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140206145105.27dec37b16f24e4ac5fd90ce@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390388025-1418-1-git-send-email-raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:23:45 +0530 Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> max_sane_readahead returns zero on the cpu having no local memory
> node. Fix that by returning a sanitized number of pages viz.,
> minimum of (requested pages, 4k)

um, fix what?  The changelog should describe the user-visible impact of
the current implementation.  There are a whole bunch of reasons for
this, but I tire of typing them in day after day after day.

> --- a/mm/readahead.c
> +++ b/mm/readahead.c
> @@ -237,14 +237,32 @@ int force_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping, struct file *filp,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +#define MAX_REMOTE_READAHEAD   4096UL
>  /*
>   * Given a desired number of PAGE_CACHE_SIZE readahead pages, return a
>   * sensible upper limit.
>   */
>  unsigned long max_sane_readahead(unsigned long nr)
>  {
> -	return min(nr, (node_page_state(numa_node_id(), NR_INACTIVE_FILE)
> -		+ node_page_state(numa_node_id(), NR_FREE_PAGES)) / 2);
> +	unsigned long local_free_page;
> +	int nid;
> +
> +	nid = numa_node_id();
> +	if (node_present_pages(nid)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * We sanitize readahead size depending on free memory in
> +		 * the local node.
> +		 */
> +		local_free_page = node_page_state(nid, NR_INACTIVE_FILE)
> +				 + node_page_state(nid, NR_FREE_PAGES);
> +		return min(nr, local_free_page / 2);
> +	}
> +	/*
> +	 * Readahead onto remote memory is better than no readahead when local
> +	 * numa node does not have memory. We limit the readahead to 4k
> +	 * pages though to avoid trashing page cache.
> +	 */
> +	return min(nr, MAX_REMOTE_READAHEAD);
>  }

Looks reasonable to me.  Please send along a fixed up changelog.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-06 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-22 10:53 [RFC PATCH V5] mm readahead: Fix readahead fail for no local memory and limit readahead pages Raghavendra K T
2014-02-03  8:30 ` Raghavendra K T
2014-02-06 22:51 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2014-02-06 22:58   ` David Rientjes
2014-02-06 23:22     ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-06 23:48       ` David Rientjes
2014-02-06 23:58         ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 10:42           ` Raghavendra K T
2014-02-07 20:41             ` David Rientjes
2014-02-10  8:21               ` Raghavendra K T
2014-02-10 10:05                 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-10 12:25                   ` Raghavendra K T
2014-02-10 21:35                     ` David Rientjes
2014-02-13  7:07                       ` Raghavendra K T
2014-02-13  8:05                         ` David Rientjes
2014-02-13 10:04                           ` Raghavendra K T
2014-02-13 22:41                             ` David Rientjes
2014-02-14  0:14                               ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-14  0:37                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-14  0:45                                   ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-14  4:32                                   ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-14 10:54                                     ` David Rientjes
2014-02-17 19:28                                       ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-17 23:14                                         ` David Rientjes
2014-02-18  1:31                                           ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-17 22:59                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-14  7:43                                   ` Jan Kara
2014-02-17 22:57                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-14  5:47                               ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-13 21:06                           ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-13 21:42                             ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-10  8:29   ` [RFC PATCH V5 RESEND] " Raghavendra K T

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140206145105.27dec37b16f24e4ac5fd90ce@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=damien.ramonda@intel.com \
    --cc=david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).