From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Han Pingtian <hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:11:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140206191131.GB7845@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAmzW4PXkdpNi5pZ=4BzdXNvqTEAhcuw-x0pWidqrxzdePxXxA@mail.gmail.com>
On 06.02.2014 [19:29:16 +0900], Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 2014-02-06 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>:
> > On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> >>
> >
> > I may be misunderstanding this patch and there's no help because there's
> > no changelog.
>
> Sorry about that.
> I made this patch just for testing. :)
> Thanks for looking this.
>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
> >> index 12ae6ce..a6d5438 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/topology.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/topology.h
> >> @@ -233,11 +233,20 @@ static inline int numa_node_id(void)
> >> * Use the accessor functions set_numa_mem(), numa_mem_id() and cpu_to_mem().
> >> */
> >> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, _numa_mem_);
> >> +int _node_numa_mem_[MAX_NUMNODES];
> >>
> >> #ifndef set_numa_mem
> >> static inline void set_numa_mem(int node)
> >> {
> >> this_cpu_write(_numa_mem_, node);
> >> + _node_numa_mem_[numa_node_id()] = node;
> >> +}
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> +#ifndef get_numa_mem
> >> +static inline int get_numa_mem(int node)
> >> +{
> >> + return _node_numa_mem_[node];
> >> }
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> @@ -260,6 +269,7 @@ static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu)
> >> static inline void set_cpu_numa_mem(int cpu, int node)
> >> {
> >> per_cpu(_numa_mem_, cpu) = node;
> >> + _node_numa_mem_[numa_node_id()] = node;
> >
> > The intention seems to be that _node_numa_mem_[X] for a node X will return
> > a node Y with memory that has the nearest distance? In other words,
> > caching the value returned by local_memory_node(X)?
>
> Yes, you are right.
>
> > That doesn't seem to be what it's doing since numa_node_id() is the node
> > of the cpu that current is running on so this ends up getting initialized
> > to whatever local_memory_node(cpu_to_node(cpu)) is for the last bit set in
> > cpu_possible_mask.
>
> Yes, I made a mistake.
> Thanks for pointer.
> I fix it and attach v2.
> Now I'm out of office, so I'm not sure this second version is correct :(
>
> Thanks.
>
> ----------8<--------------
> From bf691e7eb07f966e3aed251eaeb18f229ee32d1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:07:05 +0900
> Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3 v2] topology: support node_numa_mem() for
> determining the
> fallback node
>
> We need to determine the fallback node in slub allocator if the allocation
> target node is memoryless node. Without it, the SLUB wrongly select
> the node which has no memory and can't use a partial slab, because of node
> mismatch. Introduced function, node_numa_mem(X), will return
> a node Y with memory that has the nearest distance. If X is memoryless
> node, it will return nearest distance node, but, if
> X is normal node, it will return itself.
>
> We will use this function in following patch to determine the fallback
> node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
> index 12ae6ce..66b19b8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/topology.h
> @@ -233,11 +233,20 @@ static inline int numa_node_id(void)
> * Use the accessor functions set_numa_mem(), numa_mem_id() and cpu_to_mem().
> */
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, _numa_mem_);
> +int _node_numa_mem_[MAX_NUMNODES];
Should be static, I think?
>
> #ifndef set_numa_mem
> static inline void set_numa_mem(int node)
> {
> this_cpu_write(_numa_mem_, node);
> + _node_numa_mem_[numa_node_id()] = node;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef get_numa_mem
> +static inline int get_numa_mem(int node)
> +{
> + return _node_numa_mem_[node];
> }
> #endif
>
> @@ -260,6 +269,7 @@ static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu)
> static inline void set_cpu_numa_mem(int cpu, int node)
> {
> per_cpu(_numa_mem_, cpu) = node;
> + _node_numa_mem_[cpu_to_node(cpu)] = node;
> }
> #endif
>
> @@ -273,6 +283,13 @@ static inline int numa_mem_id(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef get_numa_mem
> +static inline int get_numa_mem(int node)
> +{
> + return node;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #ifndef cpu_to_mem
> static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu)
> {
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-06 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-07 2:21 [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory Anton Blanchard
2014-01-07 4:19 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 4:19 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 4:19 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 6:49 ` Andi Kleen
2014-01-08 14:03 ` Anton Blanchard
2014-01-07 7:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-01-07 8:48 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 8:48 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 8:48 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 9:10 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-01-07 9:21 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 9:21 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 9:21 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 9:31 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-01-07 9:49 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 9:49 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 9:49 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 9:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 9:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 9:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-09 0:20 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-01-20 9:10 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-20 9:10 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-20 9:10 ` Wanpeng Li
[not found] ` <52dce7fe.e5e6420a.5ff6.ffff84a0SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2014-01-20 22:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-21 2:20 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-21 2:20 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-21 2:20 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-24 3:09 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-24 3:09 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-24 3:09 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-24 3:14 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-24 3:14 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-24 3:14 ` Wanpeng Li
[not found] ` <52e1da8f.86f7440a.120f.25f3SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2014-01-24 15:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-24 21:03 ` David Rientjes
2014-01-24 22:19 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-01-24 23:29 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-01-24 23:49 ` David Rientjes
2014-01-25 0:16 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-01-25 0:25 ` David Rientjes
2014-01-25 1:10 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-01-27 5:58 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-01-28 18:29 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-01-29 15:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-29 22:36 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-01-30 16:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-03 23:00 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-04 3:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-04 7:26 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-04 20:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-05 0:13 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-05 19:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-06 2:08 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-06 17:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-27 16:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-06 2:07 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-06 8:04 ` Joonsoo Kim
[not found] ` <20140206185955.GA7845@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-02-06 19:28 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-07 8:03 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-06 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id() Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-06 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-06 8:52 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-06 10:29 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-06 19:11 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2014-02-07 5:42 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-06 20:52 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 5:48 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07 17:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-07 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-07 21:38 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-10 1:15 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-10 1:29 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-11 18:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-10 19:13 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-11 7:42 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-12 22:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-13 3:53 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-17 6:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-18 16:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-19 22:04 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-20 16:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-24 5:08 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-24 19:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-03-13 16:51 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-18 17:22 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-13 6:51 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-17 7:00 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-18 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-18 17:28 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-18 19:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-18 21:09 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-18 21:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-18 22:22 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-19 16:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-19 22:03 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-08 9:57 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-10 1:09 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-07-22 1:03 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-07-22 1:16 ` David Rientjes
2014-07-22 21:43 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-07-22 21:49 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-22 23:47 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-07-23 0:43 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-06 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] slub: fallback to get_numa_mem() node if we want to allocate on memoryless node Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-06 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-07 5:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07 17:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-10 1:22 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-06 8:37 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id() David Rientjes
2014-02-06 17:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-06 17:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-16 23:37 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-05-19 2:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-05 0:13 ` [RESEND PATCH] " David Rientjes
2014-01-27 16:24 ` [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory Christoph Lameter
2014-01-27 16:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-07 9:42 ` David Laight
2014-01-08 14:14 ` Anton Blanchard
2014-01-07 10:28 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 10:28 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 10:28 ` Wanpeng Li
[not found] ` <20140107041939.GA20916@hacker.(null)>
2014-01-08 14:17 ` Anton Blanchard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140206191131.GB7845@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).