linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] mm: Remove ifdef condition in include/linux/mm.h
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 15:27:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140207232711.GA16836@jtriplet-mobl1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402071503120.24644@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 03:09:09PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> > > > > > index 1cedd00..5f8348f 100644
> > > > > > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > > > > > @@ -1589,10 +1589,8 @@ static inline int __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
> > > > > >  #else
> > > > > >  /* please see mm/page_alloc.c */
> > > > > >  extern int __meminit early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
> > > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
> > > > > >  /* there is a per-arch backend function. */
> > > > > >  extern int __meminit __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
> > > > > > -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID */
> > > > > >  #endif
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  extern void set_dma_reserve(unsigned long new_dma_reserve);
> > > > > 
> > > > > Wouldn't it be better to just declare the __early_pfn_to_nid() in 
> > > > > mm/page_alloc.c to be static?
> > > > 
> > > > Won't that break the ability to override that function in
> > > > architecture-specific code (as arch/ia64/mm/numa.c does)?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Why?  CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID should define where this function 
> > > is defined so ia64 should have it set and the definition which I'm 
> > > suggesting be static is only compiled when this is undefined in 
> > > mm/page_alloc.c.  I'm not sure why we'd want to be messing with the 
> > > declaration?
> > 
> > __early_pfn_to_nid() must be global if it is implemented in arch/. 
> > 
> 
> Why??  If CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID then, yes, we need it to be 
> global.  Otherwise it's perfectly fine just being static in file scope.  
> This causes the compilation unit to break when you compile it, not wait 
> until vmlinux and find undefined references.
> 
> I see no reason it can't be done like this in mm/page_alloc.c:
> 
> 	#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
> 	extern int __meminit __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);

No, a .c file should not have an extern declaration in it.  This should
live in an appropriate header file, to be included in both page_alloc.c
and any arch file that defines an overriding function.

> Both of these options look much better than
> 
> 	include/linux/mm.h:
> 
> 	#if !defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP) && \
> 	    !defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID)
> 	static inline int __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
> 	{
> 	        return 0;
> 	}
> 	#else
> 	/* please see mm/page_alloc.c */
> 	extern int __meminit early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
> 	#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
> 	/* there is a per-arch backend function. */
> 	extern int __meminit __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
> 	#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID */
> 	#endif
> 
> where all this confusion is originating from.

The proposal is to first simplify those ifdefs by eliminating the inner
one in the #else; I agree with Andrew that we ought to go ahead and take
that step given the patch at hand, and then figure out if there's an
additional simplification possible.

- Josh Triplett

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-07 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-07 12:01 [PATCH 1/9] mm: Mark function as static in compaction.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 12:03 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: Mark functions as static in memory.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 13:03   ` Rik van Riel
2014-02-07 20:47   ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:04 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: Mark function as static in mmap.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 13:16   ` Rik van Riel
2014-02-07 20:47   ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:07 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm: Mark function as static in process_vm_access.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 20:49   ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:08 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm: Mark functions as static in migrate.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 13:16   ` Rik van Riel
2014-02-07 20:49   ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:10 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm: Mark function as static in memcontrol.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 20:55   ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:11 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm: Mark functions as static in page_cgroup.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 20:56   ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:12 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm: Mark function as static in nobootmem.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 20:57   ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm: Remove ifdef condition in include/linux/mm.h Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 13:18   ` Rik van Riel
2014-02-07 21:04   ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 21:07     ` Josh Triplett
2014-02-07 21:15       ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 22:30         ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-07 23:09           ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 23:27             ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2014-02-08  1:02               ` David Rientjes
2014-02-08  1:25                 ` Josh Triplett
2014-02-07 12:51 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: Mark function as static in compaction.c Rik van Riel
2014-02-07 20:43 ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140207232711.GA16836@jtriplet-mobl1 \
    --to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rashika.kheria@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).