From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] mm: Remove ifdef condition in include/linux/mm.h
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 15:27:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140207232711.GA16836@jtriplet-mobl1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402071503120.24644@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 03:09:09PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> > > > > > index 1cedd00..5f8348f 100644
> > > > > > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > > > > > @@ -1589,10 +1589,8 @@ static inline int __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
> > > > > > #else
> > > > > > /* please see mm/page_alloc.c */
> > > > > > extern int __meminit early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
> > > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
> > > > > > /* there is a per-arch backend function. */
> > > > > > extern int __meminit __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
> > > > > > -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID */
> > > > > > #endif
> > > > > >
> > > > > > extern void set_dma_reserve(unsigned long new_dma_reserve);
> > > > >
> > > > > Wouldn't it be better to just declare the __early_pfn_to_nid() in
> > > > > mm/page_alloc.c to be static?
> > > >
> > > > Won't that break the ability to override that function in
> > > > architecture-specific code (as arch/ia64/mm/numa.c does)?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Why? CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID should define where this function
> > > is defined so ia64 should have it set and the definition which I'm
> > > suggesting be static is only compiled when this is undefined in
> > > mm/page_alloc.c. I'm not sure why we'd want to be messing with the
> > > declaration?
> >
> > __early_pfn_to_nid() must be global if it is implemented in arch/.
> >
>
> Why?? If CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID then, yes, we need it to be
> global. Otherwise it's perfectly fine just being static in file scope.
> This causes the compilation unit to break when you compile it, not wait
> until vmlinux and find undefined references.
>
> I see no reason it can't be done like this in mm/page_alloc.c:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
> extern int __meminit __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
No, a .c file should not have an extern declaration in it. This should
live in an appropriate header file, to be included in both page_alloc.c
and any arch file that defines an overriding function.
> Both of these options look much better than
>
> include/linux/mm.h:
>
> #if !defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP) && \
> !defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID)
> static inline int __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> #else
> /* please see mm/page_alloc.c */
> extern int __meminit early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
> /* there is a per-arch backend function. */
> extern int __meminit __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
> #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID */
> #endif
>
> where all this confusion is originating from.
The proposal is to first simplify those ifdefs by eliminating the inner
one in the #else; I agree with Andrew that we ought to go ahead and take
that step given the patch at hand, and then figure out if there's an
additional simplification possible.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-07 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-07 12:01 [PATCH 1/9] mm: Mark function as static in compaction.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 12:03 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: Mark functions as static in memory.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 13:03 ` Rik van Riel
2014-02-07 20:47 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:04 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: Mark function as static in mmap.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 13:16 ` Rik van Riel
2014-02-07 20:47 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:07 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm: Mark function as static in process_vm_access.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 20:49 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:08 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm: Mark functions as static in migrate.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 13:16 ` Rik van Riel
2014-02-07 20:49 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:10 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm: Mark function as static in memcontrol.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 20:55 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:11 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm: Mark functions as static in page_cgroup.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 20:56 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:12 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm: Mark function as static in nobootmem.c Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 20:57 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 12:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm: Remove ifdef condition in include/linux/mm.h Rashika Kheria
2014-02-07 13:18 ` Rik van Riel
2014-02-07 21:04 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 21:07 ` Josh Triplett
2014-02-07 21:15 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-07 23:09 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-07 23:27 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2014-02-08 1:02 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-08 1:25 ` Josh Triplett
2014-02-07 12:51 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: Mark function as static in compaction.c Rik van Riel
2014-02-07 20:43 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140207232711.GA16836@jtriplet-mobl1 \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rashika.kheria@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).