linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mm/compaction: check pageblock suitability once per pageblock
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:46:26 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140210004626.GC12049@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F4B5AA.2040006@suse.cz>

On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:30:02AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 02/07/2014 06:08 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > isolation_suitable() and migrate_async_suitable() is used to be sure
> > that this pageblock range is fine to be migragted. It isn't needed to
> > call it on every page. Current code do well if not suitable, but, don't
> > do well when suitable. It re-check it on every valid pageblock.
> > This patch fix this situation by updating last_pageblock_nr.
> 
> It took me a while to understand that the problem with migrate_async_suitable() was the
> lack of last_pageblock_nr updates (when the code doesn't go through next_pageblock:
> label), while the problem with isolation_suitable() was the lack of doing the test only
> when last_pageblock_nr != pageblock_nr (so two different things). How bout making it
> clearer in the changelog by replacing the paragraph above with something like:

Really nice!!
Sorry for bad description and thanks for taking time to understand it.

> 
> <snip>
> isolation_suitable() and migrate_async_suitable() is used to be sure
> that this pageblock range is fine to be migragted. It isn't needed to
> call it on every page. Current code do well if not suitable, but, don't
> do well when suitable.
> 
> 1) It re-checks isolation_suitable() on each page of a pageblock that was already
> estabilished as suitable.
> 2) It re-checks migrate_async_suitable() on each page of a pageblock that was not entered
> through the next_pageblock: label, because last_pageblock_nr is not otherwise updated.
> 
> This patch fixes situation by 1) calling isolation_suitable() only once per pageblock and
> 2) always updating last_pageblock_nr to the pageblock that was just checked.
> </snip>
> 
> > Additionally, move PageBuddy() check after pageblock unit check,
> > since pageblock check is the first thing we should do and makes things
> > more simple.
> 
> You should also do this, since it becomes redundant and might only confuse people:
> 
>  next_pageblock:
>                  low_pfn = ALIGN(low_pfn + 1, pageblock_nr_pages) - 1;
> -                last_pageblock_nr = pageblock_nr;
> 

Okay.

> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> 
> With the above resolved, consider the patch to be
> 
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

I will do it.
Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-10  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-07  5:08 [PATCH 0/5] compaction related commits Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07  5:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/compaction: disallow high-order page for migration target Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07  9:20   ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-02-10 13:26   ` Mel Gorman
2014-02-11  7:12     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07  5:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/compaction: do not call suitable_migration_target() on every page Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07  9:36   ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-02-10  0:41     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07  5:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/compaction: change the timing to check to drop the spinlock Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07  9:50   ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-02-07  5:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/compaction: check pageblock suitability once per pageblock Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07 10:30   ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-02-10  0:46     ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2014-02-07  5:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/compaction: clean-up code on success of ballon isolation Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07 10:33   ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-02-07  9:14 ` [PATCH 0/5] compaction related commits Vlastimil Babka
2014-02-10  0:24   ` Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140210004626.GC12049@lge.com \
    --to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).