From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com (mail-pa0-f51.google.com [209.85.220.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56236B0031 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:06:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ld10so6827356pab.24 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:06:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id zk9si16835146pac.318.2014.02.10.15.06.16 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:06:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:06:14 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/zswap: add writethrough option Message-Id: <20140210150614.c6a1b20553803da5f81acb72@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1387459407-29342-1-git-send-email-ddstreet@ieee.org> <1390831279-5525-1-git-send-email-ddstreet@ieee.org> <20140203150835.f55fd427d0ebb0c2943f266b@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dan Streetman Cc: Seth Jennings , Linux-MM , linux-kernel , Bob Liu , Minchan Kim , Weijie Yang , Shirish Pargaonkar , Mel Gorman On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:05:14 -0500 Dan Streetman wrote: > > > > It does sound like the feature is of marginal benefit. Is "zswap > > filled up" an interesting or useful case to optimize? > > > > otoh the addition is pretty simple and we can later withdraw the whole > > thing without breaking anyone's systems. > > ping... > > you still thinking about this or is it a reject for now? I'm not seeing a compelling case for merging it and Minchan sounded rather unconvinced. Perhaps we should park it until/unless a more solid need is found? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org