linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm/compaction: disallow high-order page for migration target
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:12:25 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140211071225.GA27870@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140210132634.GE6732@suse.de>

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 01:26:34PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:08:42PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > Purpose of compaction is to get a high order page. Currently, if we find
> > high-order page while searching migration target page, we break it to
> > order-0 pages and use them as migration target. It is contrary to purpose
> > of compaction, so disallow high-order page to be used for
> > migration target.
> > 
> > Additionally, clean-up logic in suitable_migration_target() to simply.
> > There is no functional changes from this clean-up.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> > index 3a91a2e..bbe1260 100644
> > --- a/mm/compaction.c
> > +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> > @@ -217,21 +217,12 @@ static inline bool compact_trylock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock,
> >  /* Returns true if the page is within a block suitable for migration to */
> >  static bool suitable_migration_target(struct page *page)
> >  {
> > -	int migratetype = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
> > -
> > -	/* Don't interfere with memory hot-remove or the min_free_kbytes blocks */
> > -	if (migratetype == MIGRATE_RESERVE)
> > -		return false;
> > -
> 
> Why is this check removed? The reservation blocks are preserved as
> short-lived high-order atomic allocations depend on them.

Hello,

After disallowing high-order page to be used for migration target,
we only allow pages from movable or CMA pageblock for migration target on
migrate_async_suitable() check. So checking whether page comes from reserve or
isolate pageblock is useless.

> 
> > -	if (is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))
> > -		return false;
> > -
> 
> Why is this check removed?
> 
> > -	/* If the page is a large free page, then allow migration */
> > +	/* If the page is a large free page, then disallow migration */
> >  	if (PageBuddy(page) && page_order(page) >= pageblock_order)
> > -		return true;
> > +		return false;
> >  
> 
> The reason why this was originally allowed was to allow pageblocks that were
> marked MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE or MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE to be used as compaction
> targets. However, compaction should not even be running if this is the
> case so the change makes sense.

Okay!

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-11  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-07  5:08 [PATCH 0/5] compaction related commits Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07  5:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/compaction: disallow high-order page for migration target Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07  9:20   ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-02-10 13:26   ` Mel Gorman
2014-02-11  7:12     ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2014-02-07  5:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/compaction: do not call suitable_migration_target() on every page Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07  9:36   ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-02-10  0:41     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07  5:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/compaction: change the timing to check to drop the spinlock Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07  9:50   ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-02-07  5:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/compaction: check pageblock suitability once per pageblock Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07 10:30   ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-02-10  0:46     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07  5:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/compaction: clean-up code on success of ballon isolation Joonsoo Kim
2014-02-07 10:33   ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-02-07  9:14 ` [PATCH 0/5] compaction related commits Vlastimil Babka
2014-02-10  0:24   ` Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140211071225.GA27870@lge.com \
    --to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).