linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: exclude memory less nodes from zone_reclaim
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:40:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140219194039.GA5825@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140219174940.GF27108@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed 19-02-14 09:49:41, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 19.02.2014 [18:32:59 +0100], Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 19-02-14 09:16:28, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
[...]
> > > I don't think this will work, because what sets N_HIGH_MEMORY (and
> > > shouldn't it be N_MEMORY?)
> > 
> > This should be the same thing AFAIU.
> 
> I don't think they are guaranteed to be? And, in any case, semantically,
> we care if a node has MEMORY, not if it has HIGH_MEMORY?

I don't know. The whole MEMORY vs HIGH_MEMORY thing is really
confusing. But my understanding was that HIGH_MEMORY is superset of the
other one. But now that I look at the code again it seems that N_MEMORY
is the right thing to use here. I will repost the patch tomorrow if
other parts are good.

[...]
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-19 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-18  9:06 ppc: RECLAIM_DISTANCE 10? Michal Hocko
2014-02-18 22:27 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-19  8:16   ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-19  8:20     ` David Rientjes
2014-02-19  9:19       ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-19 21:45         ` David Rientjes
2014-02-18 23:34 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-18 23:58   ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-19  0:40     ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-19  1:43     ` David Rientjes
2014-02-19  8:33       ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-19 16:24       ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-19 16:33         ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-20  9:55           ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-19  8:23   ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-19 16:26     ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-19 17:03     ` [RFC PATCH] mm: exclude memory less nodes from zone_reclaim Michal Hocko
2014-02-19 17:16       ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-19 17:32         ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-19 17:49           ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-19 19:40             ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2014-02-19 17:53       ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-19 21:56         ` David Rientjes
2014-02-19 23:05           ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-02-20  9:50             ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140219194039.GA5825@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).