From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ning Qu <quning@gmail.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] mm, shmem: map few pages around fault address if they are in page cache
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 02:50:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140304005001.GA21508@node.dhcp.inet.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140303153707.beced5c271179d1b1658a246@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:37:07PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:29:00 -0800 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > When the file is uncached, results are peculiar:
> > >
> > > 0.00user 2.84system 0:50.90elapsed 5%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4198096maxresident)k
> > > 0inputs+0outputs (1major+49666minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> > >
> > > That's approximately 3x more minor faults.
> >
> > This is not peculiar.
> >
> > When the file is uncached, some pages will obviously be under IO due
> > to readahead etc. And the fault-around code very much on purpose will
> > *not* try to wait for those pages, so any busy pages will just simply
> > not be faulted-around.
>
> Of course.
>
> > So you should still have fewer minor faults than faulting on *every*
> > page (ie the non-fault-around case), but I would very much expect that
> > fault-around will not see the full "one sixteenth" reduction in minor
> > faults.
> >
> > And the order of IO will not matter, since the read-ahead is
> > asynchronous wrt the page-faults.
>
> When a pagefault hits a locked, not-uptodate page it is going to block.
> Once it wakes up we'd *like* to find lots of now-uptodate pages in
> that page's vicinity. Obviously, that is happening, but not to the
> fullest possible extent. We _could_ still achieve the 16x if readahead
> was cooperating in an ideal fashion.
>
> I don't know what's going on in there to produce this consistent 3x
> factor.
In my VM numbers are different (fault in 1G):
cold cache: 2097352inputs+0outputs (2major+25048minor)pagefaults 0swaps
hot cache: 0inputs+0outputs (0major+16450minor)pagefaults 0swaps
~1.5x more page faults with cold cache comparing to hot cache.
BTW, moving do_fault_around() below __do_fault() doesn't make much better:
cold cache: 2097200inputs+0outputs (1major+24641minor)pagefaults 0swaps
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-04 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-28 22:18 [PATCH 0/1] mm, shmem: map few pages around fault address if they are in page cache Ning Qu
2014-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 1/1] mm: implement ->map_pages for shmem/tmpfs Ning Qu
2014-03-01 1:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-03-01 6:36 ` Ning Qu
2014-03-03 11:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-03-03 18:49 ` Ning Qu
2014-03-04 20:02 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-28 22:34 ` [PATCH 0/1] mm, shmem: map few pages around fault address if they are in page cache Andrew Morton
2014-02-28 22:35 ` Ning Qu
2014-03-01 0:35 ` Ning Qu
2014-03-01 1:41 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-01 6:10 ` Ning Qu
2014-03-01 6:27 ` Ning Qu
2014-03-03 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-03 23:07 ` Ning Qu
2014-03-03 23:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 23:37 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-04 0:50 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2014-03-05 22:20 ` Ning Qu
2014-03-13 20:46 ` Ning Qu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140304005001.GA21508@node.dhcp.inet.fi \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=quning@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).