From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yh0-f53.google.com (mail-yh0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350476B0031 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:33:28 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-yh0-f53.google.com with SMTP id i57so367850yha.12 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:33:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yk0-x22b.google.com (mail-yk0-x22b.google.com [2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t51si12522496yhg.100.2014.03.06.13.33.27 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:33:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id q9so8281009ykb.2 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:33:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:33:24 -0500 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [patch 00/11] userspace out of memory handling Message-ID: <20140306213324.GG17902@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20140306204923.GF14033@htj.dyndns.org> <20140306205911.GG14033@htj.dyndns.org> <20140306211136.GA17902@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: David Rientjes Cc: Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Mel Gorman , Oleg Nesterov , Rik van Riel , Jianguo Wu , Tim Hockin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org A bit of addition. On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:23:57PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > This patchset provides a solution to a real-world problem that is not > solved with any other patchset. I expect it to be reviewed as any other > patchset, it's not an "RFC" from my perspective: it's a proposal for > inclusion. Don't worry, Andrew is not going to apply anything > accidentally. I can't force it down your throat but I feel somewhat uneasy about how this was posted without any reference to the previous discussion as if this were just now being proposed especially as the said discussion wasn't particularly favorable to this approach. Prefixing RFC or at least pointing back to the original discussion seems like the courteous thing to do. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org