From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] mm/compaction: Break out of loop on !PageBuddy in isolate_freepages_block
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:58:52 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140307025852.GC3787@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394130092-25440-1-git-send-email-lauraa@codeaurora.org>
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:21:32AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> We received several reports of bad page state when freeing CMA pages
> previously allocated with alloc_contig_range:
>
> <1>[ 1258.084111] BUG: Bad page state in process Binder_A pfn:63202
> <1>[ 1258.089763] page:d21130b0 count:0 mapcount:1 mapping: (null) index:0x7dfbf
> <1>[ 1258.096109] page flags: 0x40080068(uptodate|lru|active|swapbacked)
>
> Based on the page state, it looks like the page was still in use. The page
> flags do not make sense for the use case though. Further debugging showed
> that despite alloc_contig_range returning success, at least one page in the
> range still remained in the buddy allocator.
>
> There is an issue with isolate_freepages_block. In strict mode (which CMA
> uses), if any pages in the range cannot be isolated,
> isolate_freepages_block should return failure 0. The current check keeps
> track of the total number of isolated pages and compares against the size
> of the range:
>
> if (strict && nr_strict_required > total_isolated)
> total_isolated = 0;
>
> After taking the zone lock, if one of the pages in the range is not
> in the buddy allocator, we continue through the loop and do not
> increment total_isolated. If in the last iteration of the loop we isolate
> more than one page (e.g. last page needed is a higher order page), the
> check for total_isolated may pass and we fail to detect that a page was
> skipped. The fix is to bail out if the loop immediately if we are in
> strict mode. There's no benfit to continuing anyway since we need all
> pages to be isolated. Additionally, drop the error checking based on
> nr_strict_required and just check the pfn ranges. This matches with
> what isolate_freepages_range does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Nice catch! stable stuff?
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-07 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-06 18:21 [PATCHv2] mm/compaction: Break out of loop on !PageBuddy in isolate_freepages_block Laura Abbott
2014-03-07 0:33 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-07 22:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-03-07 2:58 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2014-03-07 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-07 22:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-03-10 15:40 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
[not found] <742FF125-8DCE-41BB-932F-6A2F8FDF3583@outlook.com>
[not found] ` <SNT405-EAS16A6AFE222C189BC611B4F808B0@phx.gbl>
2014-03-07 2:06 ` TB Boxer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140307025852.GC3787@bbox \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).