From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
axboe@kernel.dk, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
JBottomley@parallels.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] userspace PI passthrough via AIO/DIO
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 10:07:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140323170720.GE9074@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140323140244.GF2813@quack.suse.cz>
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:02:44PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sat 22-03-14 02:43:20, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 07:32:16PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:29:09PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> > > > I'll admit, though, that I don't really like having to fetch the 'has'
> > > > bits first to find out how large the rest of the struct is. Maybe
> > > > that's not worth worrying about.
> > >
> > > I'm not worrying about having to pluck 'has' out of the structure, but needing
> > > a function to tell me how big of a buffer I need for a given pile of flags
> > > seems ... icky. But maybe the ease of modifying strace and security auditors
> > > would make it worth it?
> >
> > How about explicitly specifying the structure size in struct some_more_args,
> > and checking that against whatever we find in .has? Hm. I still think that's
> > too clever for my brain to keep together for long.
> >
> > I'm also nervous that we could be creating this monster of a structure wherein
> > some user wants to tack the first and last hints ever created onto an IO, so
> > now we have to lug this huge structure around that has space for hints that
> > we're not going to use, and most of which is zeroes.
> Well, why does it matter that the structure would be big? Are do you
> think the memory consumption would matter?
I doubt the memory consumption will be a big deal (compared to the size of the
IOs), but I'm a little concerned about the overhead of copying a mostly-zeroes
user buffer into the kernel. I guess it's not a big deal to copy the whole
thing now and if people complain about the overhead, switch it to let the IO
attribute controllers selectively copy_from_user later.
--D
>
> Honza
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> SUSE Labs, CR
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-23 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-21 4:30 [RFC PATCH 0/5] userspace PI passthrough via AIO/DIO Darrick J. Wong
2014-03-21 4:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs/bio-integrity: remove duplicate code Darrick J. Wong
2014-03-21 4:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] aio/dio: enable DIX passthrough Darrick J. Wong
2014-03-21 4:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] aio/dio: allow user to ask kernel to fill in parts of the protection info Darrick J. Wong
2014-03-21 4:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] aio/dio: advertise possible userspace flags Darrick J. Wong
2014-03-21 4:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] blk-integrity: refactor various routines Darrick J. Wong
2014-03-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] userspace PI passthrough via AIO/DIO Jeff Moyer
2014-03-21 21:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-03-21 23:48 ` Zach Brown
2014-03-21 18:23 ` Zach Brown
2014-03-21 21:44 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2014-03-21 22:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-03-22 0:29 ` Zach Brown
2014-03-22 2:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-03-22 9:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-03-23 14:02 ` Jan Kara
2014-03-23 17:07 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2014-03-21 22:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-03-22 0:00 ` Zach Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140323170720.GE9074@birch.djwong.org \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).