linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: use pv-ops in {pte,pmd}_{set,clear}_flags()
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 17:29:42 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140402132942.GZ4872@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <533BF59C.1080203@parallels.com>

On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 03:33:48PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
...
> >>
> >> But you'd have to be insane to care about NUMA balancing on 32-bit,
> >> even with PAE. So restricting it to x86-64 and using the high bits (I
> >> think bits 52-62 are all available to SW) sounds fine to me.
> >>
> >> Same goes for soft-dirty. I think it's fine if we say that you won't
> >> have soft-dirty with a 32-bit kernel. Even with PAE.
> > 
> > Well, at the moment we use soft-dirty for x86-64 only in criu but there
> > were plans to implement complete 32bit support as well. While personally
> > I don't mind dropping soft-dirty for non x86-64 case, I would like
> > to hear Pavel's opinion, Pavel?
> 
> We (Parallels) don't have plans on C/R on 32-bit kernels, but I speak only
> for Parallels. However, people I know who need 32-bit C/R use ARM :)

OK, since it's x86 specific I can prepare patch for dropping softdirty on
x86-32 (this will release ugly macros in file mapping a bit but not that
significantly).

Guys, while looking into how to re-define _PAGE bits for case where present
bit is dropped I though about the form like

#define _PAGE_BIT_FILE		(_PAGE_BIT_PRESENT + 1)	/* _PAGE_BIT_RW */
#define _PAGE_BIT_NUMA		(_PAGE_BIT_PRESENT + 2)	/* _PAGE_BIT_USER */
#define _PAGE_BIT_PROTNONE	(_PAGE_BIT_PRESENT + 3)	/* _PAGE_BIT_PWT */

and while _PAGE_BIT_FILE case should work (as well as swap pages), I'm not that
sure about the numa and protnone case. I fear there are some code paths which
depends on the former bits positions -- ie when

	PAGE_BIT_PROTNONE = _PAGE_BIT_NUMA = _PAGE_BIT_GLOBAL.

One of the _PAGE_BIT_GLOBAL user is the page attributes code. It seems to always check
_PAGE_BIT_PRESENT together with _PAGE_BIT_GLOBAL, so if _PAGE_BIT_PROTNONE get redefined
to a new value it should not fail. Thus main concern is protnone + numa code, which
I must admit I don't know well enough yet.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2014-04-02 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1395425902-29817-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
     [not found] ` <1395425902-29817-3-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
     [not found]   ` <533016CB.4090807@citrix.com>
     [not found]     ` <CAKbGBLiVqaHEOZx6y4MW4xDTUdKRhVLZXTTGiqYT7vuH2Wgeww@mail.gmail.com>
2014-03-25 20:16       ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: use pv-ops in {pte,pmd}_{set,clear}_flags() Linus Torvalds
2014-03-31 12:26         ` Mel Gorman
2014-03-31 15:41           ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-31 16:10             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-31 16:27               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-01 18:18             ` David Vrabel
2014-04-01 18:43               ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-01 19:03                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-02 11:33                   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2014-04-02 13:29                     ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140402132942.GZ4872@moon \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=steven@uplinklabs.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).