linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Linux-X86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: Define _PAGE_NUMA with unused physical address bits PMD and PTE levels
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 19:28:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140407182854.GH7292@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140407161910.GJ1444@moon>

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:19:10PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:49:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:32:39PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> > > On 07/04/14 16:10, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > _PAGE_NUMA is currently an alias of _PROT_PROTNONE to trap NUMA hinting
> > > > faults. As the bit is shared care is taken that _PAGE_NUMA is only used in
> > > > places where _PAGE_PROTNONE could not reach but this still causes problems
> > > > on Xen and conceptually difficult.
> > > 
> > > The problem with Xen guests occurred because mprotect() /was/ confusing
> > > PROTNONE mappings with _PAGE_NUMA and clearing the non-existant NUMA hints.
> > 
> > I didn't bother spelling it out in case I gave the impression that I was
> > blaming Xen for the problem.  As the bit is now changes, does it help
> > the Xen problem or cause another collision of some sort? There is no
> > guarantee _PAGE_NUMA will remain as bit 62 but at worst it'll use bit 11
> > and NUMA_BALANCING will depend in !KMEMCHECK.
> 
> Fwiw, we're using bit 11 for soft-dirty tracking, so i really hope worst case
> never happen. (At the moment I'm trying to figure out if with this set
> it would be possible to clean up ugly macros in pgoff_to_pte for 2 level pages).

I had considered the soft-dirty tracking usage of the same bit. I thought I'd
be able to swizzle around it or a further worst case of having soft-dirty and
automatic NUMA balancing mutually exclusive. Unfortunately upon examination
it's not obvious how to have both of them share a bit and I suspect any
attempt to will break CRIU.  In my current tree, NUMA_BALANCING cannot be
set if MEM_SOFT_DIRTY which is not particularly satisfactory. Next on the
list is examining if _PAGE_BIT_IOMAP can be used.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-07 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-07 15:10 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Use an alternative to _PAGE_PROTNONE for _PAGE_NUMA Mel Gorman
2014-04-07 15:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: Require x86-64 for automatic NUMA balancing Mel Gorman
2014-04-07 15:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: Define _PAGE_NUMA with unused physical address bits PMD and PTE levels Mel Gorman
2014-04-07 15:32   ` David Vrabel
2014-04-07 15:49     ` Mel Gorman
2014-04-07 16:19       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-07 18:28         ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2014-04-07 19:16           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-07 19:27           ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-07 19:36             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-07 19:42               ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-07 21:25                 ` Mel Gorman
2014-04-08  4:04                   ` Steven Noonan
2014-04-08 15:16                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-08 16:02                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-08 16:16                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-08 16:47                           ` Mel Gorman
2014-04-08 16:50                           ` David Vrabel
2014-04-08 16:51                         ` Mel Gorman
2014-04-09 15:18                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-09 15:39                             ` Mel Gorman
2014-04-08 20:51                       ` Steven Noonan
2014-04-08 20:59                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-09 15:04                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-09 15:09                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-08  9:31               ` David Vrabel
2014-04-07 21:19             ` Mel Gorman
2014-04-07 17:37   ` Dave Hansen
2014-04-07 15:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: Allow FOLL_NUMA on FOLL_FORCE Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140407182854.GH7292@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=steven@uplinklabs.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).