From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/19] MM: set PF_FSTRANS while allocating per-cpu memory to avoid deadlock.
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:22:01 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140416162201.5dc9ff5c@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140416054942.GD15995@dastard>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1676 bytes --]
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:49:42 +1000 Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:03:36PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > lockdep reports a locking chain
> >
> > sk_lock-AF_INET --> rtnl_mutex --> pcpu_alloc_mutex
> >
> > As sk_lock may be needed to reclaim memory, allowing that
> > reclaim while pcu_alloc_mutex is held can lead to deadlock.
> > So set PF_FSTRANS while it is help to avoid the FS reclaim.
> >
> > pcpu_alloc_mutex can be taken when rtnl_mutex is held:
> >
> > [<ffffffff8117f979>] pcpu_alloc+0x49/0x960
> > [<ffffffff8118029b>] __alloc_percpu+0xb/0x10
> > [<ffffffff8193b9f7>] loopback_dev_init+0x17/0x60
> > [<ffffffff81aaf30c>] register_netdevice+0xec/0x550
> > [<ffffffff81aaf785>] register_netdev+0x15/0x30
> >
> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
>
> This looks like a workaround to avoid passing a gfp mask around to
> describe the context in which the allocation is taking place.
> Whether or not that's the right solution, I can't say, but spreading
> this "we can turn off all reclaim of filesystem objects" mechanism
> all around the kernel doesn't sit well with me...
We are (effectively) passing a gfp mask around, except that it lives in
'current' rather than lots of other places.
I actually like the idea of discarding PF_MEMALLOC, PF_FSTRANS and
PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO, and just having current->gfp_allowed_mask (to match the
global variable of the same name).
>
> And, again, PF_FSTRANS looks plainly wrong in this code - it sure
> isn't a fs transaction context we are worried about here...
So would PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS work for you?
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-16 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-16 4:03 [PATCH/RFC 00/19] Support loop-back NFS mounts NeilBrown
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 04/19] Make effect of PF_FSTRANS to disable __GFP_FS universal NeilBrown
2014-04-16 5:37 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 6:17 ` NeilBrown
2014-04-17 1:03 ` NeilBrown
2014-04-17 4:41 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 08/19] Set PF_FSTRANS while write_cache_pages calls ->writepage NeilBrown
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 14/19] driver core: set PF_FSTRANS while holding gdp_mutex NeilBrown
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 09/19] XFS: ensure xfs_file_*_read cannot deadlock in memory allocation NeilBrown
2014-04-16 6:04 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 6:27 ` NeilBrown
2014-04-16 6:31 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 10/19] NET: set PF_FSTRANS while holding sk_lock NeilBrown
2014-04-16 5:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-04-16 5:47 ` NeilBrown
2014-04-16 13:00 ` David Miller
2014-04-17 2:38 ` NeilBrown
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 07/19] nfsd and VM: use PF_LESS_THROTTLE to avoid throttle in shrink_inactive_list NeilBrown
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 12/19] NET: set PF_FSTRANS while holding rtnl_lock NeilBrown
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 02/19] lockdep: lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state should save old value NeilBrown
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 05/19] SUNRPC: track whether a request is coming from a loop-back interface NeilBrown
2014-04-16 14:47 ` Jeff Layton
2014-04-16 23:25 ` NeilBrown
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 06/19] nfsd: set PF_FSTRANS for nfsd threads NeilBrown
2014-04-16 7:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 11/19] FS: set PF_FSTRANS while holding mmap_sem in exec.c NeilBrown
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 01/19] Promote current_{set, restore}_flags_nested from xfs to global NeilBrown
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 03/19] lockdep: improve scenario messages for RECLAIM_FS errors NeilBrown
2014-04-16 7:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 13/19] MM: set PF_FSTRANS while allocating per-cpu memory to avoid deadlock NeilBrown
2014-04-16 5:49 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 6:22 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-04-16 6:30 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 15/19] nfsd: set PF_FSTRANS when client_mutex is held NeilBrown
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 19/19] XFS: set PF_FSTRANS while ilock is held in xfs_free_eofblocks NeilBrown
2014-04-16 6:18 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 17/19] VFS: set PF_FSTRANS while namespace_sem is held NeilBrown
2014-04-16 4:46 ` Al Viro
2014-04-16 5:52 ` NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20140416155230.4d02e4b9-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-16 16:37 ` Al Viro
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 16/19] VFS: use GFP_NOFS rather than GFP_KERNEL in __d_alloc NeilBrown
2014-04-16 6:25 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 6:49 ` NeilBrown
2014-04-16 9:00 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-17 0:51 ` NeilBrown
2014-04-17 5:58 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 4:03 ` [PATCH 18/19] nfsd: set PF_FSTRANS during nfsd4_do_callback_rpc NeilBrown
2014-04-16 14:42 ` [PATCH/RFC 00/19] Support loop-back NFS mounts Jeff Layton
2014-04-17 0:20 ` NeilBrown
2014-04-17 1:27 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-17 1:50 ` NeilBrown
2014-04-17 4:23 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140416162201.5dc9ff5c@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).