linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	sandeen@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	jweiner@redhat.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	fengguang.wu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,writeback: fix divide by zero in pos_ratio_polynom
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:12:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140430081256.GA4357@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5360AE74.7050100@parallels.com>

On Wed 30-04-14 12:04:04, Maxim Patlasov wrote:
> Hi Rik!
> 
> On 04/29/2014 11:19 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >It is possible for "limit - setpoint + 1" to equal zero, leading to a
> >divide by zero error. Blindly adding 1 to "limit - setpoint" is not
> >working, so we need to actually test the divisor before calling div64.
> 
> The patch looks correct, but I'm afraid it can hide an actual bug in a
> caller of pos_ratio_polynom(). The latter is not intended for setpoint >
> limit. All callers take pains to ensure that setpoint <= limit. Look, for
> example, at global_dirty_limits():

The bug might trigger even if setpoint < limit because the result is
trucated to s32 and I guess this is what is going on here?
Is (limit - setpoint + 1) > 4G possible?

> 
> >     if (background >= dirty)
> >        background = dirty / 2;
> 
> If you ever encountered "limit - setpoint + 1" equal zero, it may be worthy
> to investigate how you came to setpoint greater than limit.
> 
> Thanks,
> Maxim
> 
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> >Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >---
> >  mm/page-writeback.c | 7 ++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> >index ef41349..2682516 100644
> >--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> >+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> >@@ -597,11 +597,16 @@ static inline long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint,
> >  					  unsigned long dirty,
> >  					  unsigned long limit)
> >  {
> >+	unsigned int divisor;
> >  	long long pos_ratio;
> >  	long x;
> >+	divisor = limit - setpoint;
> >+	if (!divisor)
> >+		divisor = 1;
> >+
> >  	x = div_s64(((s64)setpoint - (s64)dirty) << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT,
> >-		    limit - setpoint + 1);
> >+		    divisor);
> >  	pos_ratio = x;
> >  	pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
> >  	pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-30  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-29 19:19 [PATCH] mm,writeback: fix divide by zero in pos_ratio_polynom Rik van Riel
2014-04-29 19:43 ` Motohiro Kosaki
2014-04-29 22:39 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-29 22:48   ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-29 22:53     ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-30  8:04 ` Maxim Patlasov
2014-04-30  8:12   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2014-04-30  8:34     ` Maxim Patlasov
2014-04-30 10:01 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2014-04-30 13:30   ` [PATCH v2] " Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 13:48     ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 14:26       ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 14:31       ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 14:49         ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 14:52           ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 14:41       ` [PATCH v3] " Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 19:00         ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-30 19:30           ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 19:35             ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-30 20:02               ` [PATCH v4] " Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 20:13                 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-30 20:32                   ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 20:42                   ` [PATCH v5] " Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 21:00                     ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-30 21:21                       ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 21:32                     ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-02  9:16                     ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-08 10:17                     ` Masayoshi Mizuma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140430081256.GA4357@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mpatlasov@parallels.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).