linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	sandeen@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	jweiner@redhat.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	mhocko@suse.cz, fengguang.wu@intel.com, mpatlasov@parallels.com,
	Motohiro.Kosaki@us.fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm,writeback: fix divide by zero in pos_ratio_polynom
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:30:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140430093035.7e7226f2@annuminas.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5360C9E7.6010701@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:01:11 +0900
Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Hi Rik,
> 
> I applied your patch to linux-next kernel, then divide error happened
> when I ran ltp stress test.
> The divide error occurred on the following div_u64(), so the following
> should be also fixed...
> 
> static unsigned long bdi_position_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,

Good catch.  This patch fixes both places, and also has Andrew's
improvements in both places.

Andrew, this can drop in -mm instead of my previous patch and
your two cleanups to it.

---8<---

Subject: mm,writeback: fix divide by zero in pos_ratio_polynom

It is possible for "limit - setpoint + 1" to equal zero, leading to a
divide by zero error. Blindly adding 1 to "limit - setpoint" is not
working, so we need to actually test the divisor before calling div64.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
---
 mm/page-writeback.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index ef41349..f98a297 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -597,11 +597,16 @@ static inline long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint,
 					  unsigned long dirty,
 					  unsigned long limit)
 {
+	unsigned long divisor;
 	long long pos_ratio;
 	long x;
 
+	divisor = limit - setpoint;
+	if (!divisor)
+		divisor = 1;	/* Avoid div-by-zero */
+
 	x = div_s64(((s64)setpoint - (s64)dirty) << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT,
-		    limit - setpoint + 1);
+		    divisor);
 	pos_ratio = x;
 	pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
 	pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
@@ -842,8 +847,12 @@ static unsigned long bdi_position_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
 	x_intercept = bdi_setpoint + span;
 
 	if (bdi_dirty < x_intercept - span / 4) {
+		unsigned long divisor = x_intercept - bdi_setpoint;
+		if (!divisor)
+			divisor = 1;	/* Avoid div-by-zero */
+
 		pos_ratio = div_u64(pos_ratio * (x_intercept - bdi_dirty),
-				    x_intercept - bdi_setpoint + 1);
+				    divisor);
 	} else
 		pos_ratio /= 4;
 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-30 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-29 19:19 [PATCH] mm,writeback: fix divide by zero in pos_ratio_polynom Rik van Riel
2014-04-29 19:43 ` Motohiro Kosaki
2014-04-29 22:39 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-29 22:48   ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-29 22:53     ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-30  8:04 ` Maxim Patlasov
2014-04-30  8:12   ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-30  8:34     ` Maxim Patlasov
2014-04-30 10:01 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2014-04-30 13:30   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-04-30 13:48     ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 14:26       ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 14:31       ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 14:49         ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 14:52           ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 14:41       ` [PATCH v3] " Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 19:00         ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-30 19:30           ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 19:35             ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-30 20:02               ` [PATCH v4] " Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 20:13                 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-30 20:32                   ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 20:42                   ` [PATCH v5] " Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 21:00                     ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-30 21:21                       ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-30 21:32                     ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-02  9:16                     ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-08 10:17                     ` Masayoshi Mizuma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140430093035.7e7226f2@annuminas.surriel.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=Motohiro.Kosaki@us.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=mpatlasov@parallels.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).