From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com (mail-we0-f170.google.com [74.125.82.170]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960BD6B0037 for ; Thu, 1 May 2014 06:04:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so2903383wes.29 for ; Thu, 01 May 2014 03:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from collaborate-mta1.arm.com (fw-tnat.austin.arm.com. [217.140.110.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bz14si591654wib.6.2014.05.01.03.04.50 for ; Thu, 01 May 2014 03:04:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 11:04:15 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V4 6/7] arm64: mm: Enable HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE logic Message-ID: <20140501100415.GC22316@arm.com> References: <1396018892-6773-1-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org> <1396018892-6773-7-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org> <20140430152047.GF31220@arm.com> <20140430153317.GG31220@arm.com> <20140430153824.GA7166@linaro.org> <20140430172114.GI31220@arm.com> <20140501073402.GA30358@linaro.org> <20140501095246.GB22316@arm.com> <20140501095739.GO11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140501095739.GO11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Steve Capper , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "gary.robertson@linaro.org" , "anders.roxell@linaro.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 10:57:39AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 10:52:47AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Does gup_fast walking increment the mm_users? Or is it a requirement of > > the calling code? I can't seem to find where this happens. > > No, its not required at all. One should only walk current->mm with > gup_fast, any other usage is broken. OK, I get it now. > And by delaying TLB shootdown, either through disabling IRQs and > stalling IPIs or by using RCU freeing, you're guaranteed your own page > tables won't disappear underneath your feet. And for RCU to work, we still need to use the full tlb_remove_table() logic (Steve's patches just use tlb_remove_page() for table freeing). Thanks. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org