From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-f47.google.com (mail-ee0-f47.google.com [74.125.83.47]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994E96B0035 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 14:22:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ee0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c13so2933568eek.20 for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 11:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jenni2.inet.fi (mta-out1.inet.fi. [62.71.2.199]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n7si4677244eeu.349.2014.05.09.11.22.12 for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 11:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 21:19:35 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] remap_file_pages() decommission Message-ID: <20140509181935.GA24841@node.dhcp.inet.fi> References: <1399552888-11024-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20140508160205.A0EC7E009B@blue.fi.intel.com> <20140509140536.F06BFE009B@blue.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Armin Rigo , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 08:14:08AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov > wrote: > > > > Hm. I'm confused here. Do we have any limit forced per-user? > > Sure we do. See "struct user_struct". We limit max number of > processes, open files, signals etc. Okay got it. BTW, nobody seems use field 'files' of user_struct: