From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yk0-f169.google.com (mail-yk0-f169.google.com [209.85.160.169]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C896B0035 for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 19:37:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-yk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 200so2773092ykr.28 for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 16:37:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com (e39.co.us.ibm.com. [32.97.110.160]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c29si13363915yho.53.2014.05.16.16.37.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 16 May 2014 16:37:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from /spool/local by e39.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 16 May 2014 17:37:47 -0600 Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.23]) by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E10C90040 for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 19:37:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s4GNbhmd2818306 for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 23:37:43 GMT Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s4GNbho8007352 for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 19:37:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 16:37:35 -0700 From: Nishanth Aravamudan Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id() Message-ID: <20140516233735.GH8941@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20140206020757.GC5433@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1391674026-20092-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1391674026-20092-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Joonsoo Kim Cc: David Rientjes , Han Pingtian , penberg@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paulus@samba.org, Anton Blanchard , mpm@selenic.com, Christoph Lameter , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Wanpeng Li On 06.02.2014 [17:07:04 +0900], Joonsoo Kim wrote: > Currently, if allocation constraint to node is NUMA_NO_NODE, we search > a partial slab on numa_node_id() node. This doesn't work properly on the > system having memoryless node, since it can have no memory on that node and > there must be no partial slab on that node. > > On that node, page allocation always fallback to numa_mem_id() first. So > searching a partial slab on numa_node_id() in that case is proper solution > for memoryless node case. > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim Acked-by: Nishanth Aravamudan Joonsoo, would you send this one on to Andrew? Thanks, Nish -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org