linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] slub: reparent memcg caches' slabs on memcg offline
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 19:04:10 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140521150408.GB23193@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1405210937440.8038@gentwo.org>

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 09:41:03AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2014, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> 
> > 3) Per cpu partial slabs. We can disable this feature for dead caches by
> > adding appropriate check to kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial.
> 
> There is already a s->cpu_partial number in kmem_cache. If that is zero
> then no partial cpu slabs should be kept.
> 
> > So far, everything looks very simple - it seems we don't have to modify
> > __slab_free at all if we follow the instruction above.
> >
> > However, there is one thing regarding preemptable kernels. The problem
> > is after forbidding the cache store free slabs in per-cpu/node partial
> > lists by setting min_partial=0 and kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial=false
> > (i.e. marking the cache as dead), we have to make sure that all frees
> > that saw the cache as alive are over, otherwise they can occasionally
> > add a free slab to a per-cpu/node partial list *after* the cache was
> > marked dead. For instance,
> 
> Ok then lets switch off preeempt there? Preemption is not supported by
> most distribution and so will have the least impact.

Do I understand you correctly that the following change looks OK to you?

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index fdf0fe4da9a9..dc3582c2b5bb 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2676,31 +2676,31 @@ static __always_inline void slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s,
 redo:
 	/*
 	 * Determine the currently cpus per cpu slab.
 	 * The cpu may change afterward. However that does not matter since
 	 * data is retrieved via this pointer. If we are on the same cpu
 	 * during the cmpxchg then the free will succedd.
 	 */
 	preempt_disable();
 	c = this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
 
 	tid = c->tid;
-	preempt_enable();
 
 	if (likely(page == c->page)) {
 		set_freepointer(s, object, c->freelist);
 
 		if (unlikely(!this_cpu_cmpxchg_double(
 				s->cpu_slab->freelist, s->cpu_slab->tid,
 				c->freelist, tid,
 				object, next_tid(tid)))) {
 
 			note_cmpxchg_failure("slab_free", s, tid);
 			goto redo;
 		}
 		stat(s, FREE_FASTPATH);
 	} else
 		__slab_free(s, page, x, addr);
 
+	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-21 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-13 13:48 [PATCH RFC 0/3] kmemcg slab reparenting Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-13 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] slub: keep full slabs on list for per memcg caches Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-14 16:16   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-15  6:34     ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-15 15:15       ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-16 13:06         ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-16 15:05           ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-13 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] percpu-refcount: allow to get dead reference Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-13 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] slub: reparent memcg caches' slabs on memcg offline Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-14 16:20   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-15  7:16     ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-15 15:16       ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-16 13:22         ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-16 15:03           ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-19 15:24             ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-19 16:03               ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-19 18:27                 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-21 13:58                   ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-21 14:45                     ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-21 15:14                       ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-22  0:15                         ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-22 14:07                           ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-21 14:41                   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-21 15:04                     ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2014-05-22  0:13                       ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-22 13:47                         ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-22 19:25                           ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-23 15:26                             ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-23 17:45                               ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-23 19:57                                 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-27 14:38                                   ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140521150408.GB23193@esperanza \
    --to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).