From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com,
penberg@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v2 8/8] slab: make dead memcg caches discard free slabs immediately
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:18:34 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140610151830.GA8692@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1406100925270.17142@gentwo.org>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:26:19AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>
> > Frankly, I incline to shrinking dead SLAB caches periodically from
> > cache_reap too, because it looks neater and less intrusive to me. Also
> > it has zero performance impact, which is nice.
> >
> > However, Christoph proposed to disable per cpu arrays for dead caches,
> > similarly to SLUB, and I decided to give it a try, just to see the end
> > code we'd have with it.
> >
> > I'm still not quite sure which way we should choose though...
>
> Which one is cleaner?
To shrink dead caches aggressively, we only need to modify cache_reap
(see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/30/271).
To zap object arrays for dead caches (this is what this patch does), we
have to:
- set array_cache->limit to 0 for each per cpu, shared, and alien array
caches on kmem_cache_shrink;
- make cpu/node hotplug paths init new array cache sizes to 0;
- make free paths (__cache_free, cache_free_alien) handle zero array
cache size properly, because currently they doesn't.
So IMO the first one (reaping dead caches periodically) requires less
modifications and therefore is cleaner.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-10 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-06 13:22 [PATCH -mm v2 0/8] memcg/slab: reintroduce dead cache self-destruction Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 1/8] memcg: cleanup memcg_cache_params refcnt usage Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 2/8] memcg: destroy kmem caches when last slab is freed Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 3/8] memcg: mark caches that belong to offline memcgs as dead Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-10 7:48 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 10:06 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 4/8] slub: don't fail kmem_cache_shrink if slab placement optimization fails Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 5/8] slub: make slab_free non-preemptable Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 14:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-09 12:52 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-09 13:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-12 6:58 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-12 10:03 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 6/8] memcg: wait for kfree's to finish before destroying cache Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 7/8] slub: make dead memcg caches discard free slabs immediately Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 14:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-10 8:09 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 10:09 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 8/8] slab: " Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 14:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-09 13:04 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-10 7:43 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 10:03 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-10 14:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-10 15:18 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2014-06-11 8:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-11 21:24 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-12 6:53 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-12 10:02 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-13 16:34 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140610151830.GA8692@esperanza \
--to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).