From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm, compaction: periodically drop lock and restore IRQs in scanners
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:32:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140611013218.GD15630@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402305982-6928-3-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz>
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 11:26:15AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Compaction scanners regularly check for lock contention and need_resched()
> through the compact_checklock_irqsave() function. However, if there is no
> contention, the lock can be held and IRQ disabled for potentially long time.
>
> This has been addressed by commit b2eef8c0d0 ("mm: compaction: minimise the
> time IRQs are disabled while isolating pages for migration") for the migration
> scanner. However, the refactoring done by commit 748446bb6b ("mm: compaction:
> acquire the zone->lru_lock as late as possible") has changed the conditions so
> that the lock is dropped only when there's contention on the lock or
> need_resched() is true. Also, need_resched() is checked only when the lock is
> already held. The comment "give a chance to irqs before checking need_resched"
> is therefore misleading, as IRQs remain disabled when the check is done.
>
> This patch restores the behavior intended by commit b2eef8c0d0 and also tries
> to better balance and make more deterministic the time spent by checking for
> contention vs the time the scanners might run between the checks. It also
> avoids situations where checking has not been done often enough before. The
> result should be avoiding both too frequent and too infrequent contention
> checking, and especially the potentially long-running scans with IRQs disabled
> and no checking of need_resched() or for fatal signal pending, which can happen
> when many consecutive pages or pageblocks fail the preliminary tests and do not
> reach the later call site to compact_checklock_irqsave(), as explained below.
>
> Before the patch:
>
> In the migration scanner, compact_checklock_irqsave() was called each loop, if
> reached. If not reached, some lower-frequency checking could still be done if
> the lock was already held, but this would not result in aborting contended
> async compaction until reaching compact_checklock_irqsave() or end of
> pageblock. In the free scanner, it was similar but completely without the
> periodical checking, so lock can be potentially held until reaching the end of
> pageblock.
>
> After the patch, in both scanners:
>
> The periodical check is done as the first thing in the loop on each
> SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX aligned pfn, using the new compact_unlock_should_abort()
> function, which always unlocks the lock (if locked) and aborts async compaction
> if scheduling is needed or someone else holds the lock. It also aborts any type
> of compaction when a fatal signal is pending.
>
> The compact_checklock_irqsave() function is replaced with a slightly different
> compact_trylock_irqsave(). The biggest difference is that the function is not
> called at all if the lock is already held. The periodical contention checking
> is left solely to compact_unlock_should_abort(). If the lock is not held, the
> function however does avoid contended run for async compaction by aborting when
> trylock fails. Sync compaction does not use trylock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Generally, I like this but below a question.
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
> V2: do not consider need/cond_resched() in compact_trylock_irqsave(); spelling
> remove inline: compaction.o size reduced
> mm/compaction.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index d37f4a8..e1a4283 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -185,54 +185,77 @@ static void update_pageblock_skip(struct compact_control *cc,
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
>
> -enum compact_contended should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
> +/*
> + * Compaction requires the taking of some coarse locks that are potentially
> + * very heavily contended. For async compaction, back out if the lock cannot
> + * be taken immediately. For sync compaction, spin on the lock if needed.
> + *
> + * Returns true if the lock is held
> + * Returns false if the lock is not held and compaction should abort
> + */
> +static bool compact_trylock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock,
> + unsigned long *flags, struct compact_control *cc)
> {
> - if (need_resched())
> - return COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED;
> - else if (spin_is_contended(lock))
> - return COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK;
> - else
> - return COMPACT_CONTENDED_NONE;
> + if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC) {
> + if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(lock, *flags)) {
> + cc->contended = COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK;
> + return false;
> + }
> + } else {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(lock, *flags);
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> }
>
> /*
> * Compaction requires the taking of some coarse locks that are potentially
> - * very heavily contended. Check if the process needs to be scheduled or
> - * if the lock is contended. For async compaction, back out in the event
> - * if contention is severe. For sync compaction, schedule.
> + * very heavily contended. The lock should be periodically unlocked to avoid
> + * having disabled IRQs for a long time, even when there is nobody waiting on
> + * the lock. It might also be that allowing the IRQs will result in
> + * need_resched() becoming true. If scheduling is needed, or somebody else
> + * has taken the lock, async compaction aborts. Sync compaction schedules.
> + * Either compaction type will also abort if a fatal signal is pending.
> + * In either case if the lock was locked, it is dropped and not regained.
> *
> - * Returns true if the lock is held.
> - * Returns false if the lock is released and compaction should abort
> + * Returns true if compaction should abort due to fatal signal pending, or
> + * async compaction due to lock contention or need to schedule
> + * Returns false when compaction can continue (sync compaction might have
> + * scheduled)
> */
> -static bool compact_checklock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
> - bool locked, struct compact_control *cc)
> +static bool compact_unlock_should_abort(spinlock_t *lock,
> + unsigned long flags, bool *locked, struct compact_control *cc)
> {
> - enum compact_contended contended = should_release_lock(lock);
> + if (*locked) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
> + *locked = false;
> + }
>
> - if (contended) {
> - if (locked) {
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, *flags);
> - locked = false;
> - }
> + if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
> + cc->contended = COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED;
> + return true;
> + }
>
> - /* async aborts if taking too long or contended */
> - if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC) {
> - cc->contended = contended;
> - return false;
> + if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC) {
> + if (need_resched()) {
> + cc->contended = COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED;
> + return true;
> }
> -
> + if (spin_is_locked(lock)) {
Why do you use spin_is_locked instead of spin_is_contended?
> + cc->contended = COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK;
> + return true;
> + }
> + } else {
> cond_resched();
> }
>
> - if (!locked)
> - spin_lock_irqsave(lock, *flags);
> - return true;
> + return false;
> }
>
> /*
> * Aside from avoiding lock contention, compaction also periodically checks
> * need_resched() and either schedules in sync compaction or aborts async
> - * compaction. This is similar to what compact_checklock_irqsave() does, but
> + * compaction. This is similar to what compact_unlock_should_abort() does, but
> * is used where no lock is concerned.
> *
> * Returns false when no scheduling was needed, or sync compaction scheduled.
> @@ -291,6 +314,16 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
> int isolated, i;
> struct page *page = cursor;
>
> + /*
> + * Periodically drop the lock (if held) regardless of its
> + * contention, to give chance to IRQs. Abort async compaction
> + * if contended.
> + */
> + if (!(blockpfn % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
> + && compact_unlock_should_abort(&cc->zone->lock, flags,
> + &locked, cc))
> + break;
> +
> nr_scanned++;
> if (!pfn_valid_within(blockpfn))
> goto isolate_fail;
> @@ -308,8 +341,9 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
> * spin on the lock and we acquire the lock as late as
> * possible.
> */
> - locked = compact_checklock_irqsave(&cc->zone->lock, &flags,
> - locked, cc);
> + if (!locked)
> + locked = compact_trylock_irqsave(&cc->zone->lock,
> + &flags, cc);
> if (!locked)
> break;
>
> @@ -514,13 +548,15 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>
> /* Time to isolate some pages for migration */
> for (; low_pfn < end_pfn; low_pfn++) {
> - /* give a chance to irqs before checking need_resched() */
> - if (locked && !(low_pfn % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
> - if (should_release_lock(&zone->lru_lock)) {
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> - locked = false;
> - }
> - }
> + /*
> + * Periodically drop the lock (if held) regardless of its
> + * contention, to give chance to IRQs. Abort async compaction
> + * if contended.
> + */
> + if (!(low_pfn % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
> + && compact_unlock_should_abort(&zone->lru_lock, flags,
> + &locked, cc))
> + break;
>
> /*
> * migrate_pfn does not necessarily start aligned to a
> @@ -622,10 +658,11 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> page_count(page) > page_mapcount(page))
> continue;
>
> - /* Check if it is ok to still hold the lock */
> - locked = compact_checklock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, &flags,
> - locked, cc);
> - if (!locked || fatal_signal_pending(current))
> + /* If the lock is not held, try to take it */
> + if (!locked)
> + locked = compact_trylock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock,
> + &flags, cc);
> + if (!locked)
> break;
>
> /* Recheck PageLRU and PageTransHuge under lock */
> --
> 1.8.4.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-11 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-09 9:26 [PATCH 01/10] mm, compaction: do not recheck suitable_migration_target under lock Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm, compaction: report compaction as contended only due to lock contention Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 23:50 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-10 7:11 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-10 23:40 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-11 1:10 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-11 12:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-11 23:49 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-12 14:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-13 2:40 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-20 11:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm, compaction: periodically drop lock and restore IRQs in scanners Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 23:58 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-10 7:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-10 23:41 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-11 1:32 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2014-06-11 11:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm, compaction: skip rechecks when lock was already held Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-10 0:00 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-11 1:50 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm, compaction: remember position within pageblock in free pages scanner Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-10 0:07 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-11 2:12 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-11 8:16 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-11 11:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-11 11:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-11 3:29 ` Zhang Yanfei
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm, compaction: skip buddy pages by their order in the migrate scanner Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-10 0:08 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm: rename allocflags_to_migratetype for clarity Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-11 2:41 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-11 3:38 ` Zhang Yanfei
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm, compaction: pass gfp mask to compact_control Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-11 2:48 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-11 11:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-12 0:24 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] mm, compaction: try to capture the just-created high-order freepage Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-11 14:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-12 2:20 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-12 8:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] mm, compaction: do not migrate pages when that cannot satisfy page fault allocation Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm, compaction: do not recheck suitable_migration_target under lock David Rientjes
2014-06-11 0:33 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-11 2:45 ` Zhang Yanfei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140611013218.GD15630@bbox \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).