linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com,
	penberg@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.cz,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v2 8/8] slab: make dead memcg caches discard free slabs immediately
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 01:24:34 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140611212431.GA16589@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140610151830.GA8692@esperanza>

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:18:34PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:26:19AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > 
> > > Frankly, I incline to shrinking dead SLAB caches periodically from
> > > cache_reap too, because it looks neater and less intrusive to me. Also
> > > it has zero performance impact, which is nice.
> > >
> > > However, Christoph proposed to disable per cpu arrays for dead caches,
> > > similarly to SLUB, and I decided to give it a try, just to see the end
> > > code we'd have with it.
> > >
> > > I'm still not quite sure which way we should choose though...
> > 
> > Which one is cleaner?
> 
> To shrink dead caches aggressively, we only need to modify cache_reap
> (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/30/271).

Hmm, reap_alien, which is called from cache_reap to shrink per node
alien object arrays, only processes one node at a time. That means with
the patch I gave a link to above it will take up to
(REAPTIMEOUT_AC*nr_online_nodes) seconds to destroy a virtually empty
dead cache, which may be quite long on large machines. Of course, we can
make reap_alien walk over all alien caches of the current node, but that
will probably hurt performance...

> 
> To zap object arrays for dead caches (this is what this patch does), we
> have to:
>  - set array_cache->limit to 0 for each per cpu, shared, and alien array
>    caches on kmem_cache_shrink;
>  - make cpu/node hotplug paths init new array cache sizes to 0;
>  - make free paths (__cache_free, cache_free_alien) handle zero array
>    cache size properly, because currently they doesn't.
> 
> So IMO the first one (reaping dead caches periodically) requires less
> modifications and therefore is cleaner.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-11 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-06 13:22 [PATCH -mm v2 0/8] memcg/slab: reintroduce dead cache self-destruction Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 1/8] memcg: cleanup memcg_cache_params refcnt usage Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 2/8] memcg: destroy kmem caches when last slab is freed Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 3/8] memcg: mark caches that belong to offline memcgs as dead Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-10  7:48   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 10:06     ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 4/8] slub: don't fail kmem_cache_shrink if slab placement optimization fails Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 5/8] slub: make slab_free non-preemptable Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 14:46   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-09 12:52     ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-09 13:52       ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-12  6:58   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-12 10:03     ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 6/8] memcg: wait for kfree's to finish before destroying cache Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 7/8] slub: make dead memcg caches discard free slabs immediately Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 14:48   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-10  8:09   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 10:09     ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 8/8] slab: " Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 14:52   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-09 13:04     ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-10  7:43   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 10:03     ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-10 14:26       ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-10 15:18         ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-11  8:11           ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-11 21:24           ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2014-06-12  6:53             ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-12 10:02               ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-13 16:34               ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140611212431.GA16589@esperanza \
    --to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).