From: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: Some RAS bug fix patches
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 04:05:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140719080534.GA32421@gchen.bj.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405478082-30757-1-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 858 bytes --]
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:34:39PM -0400, Chen, Gong wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:34:39 -0400
> From: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
> To: tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de
> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org
> Subject: Some RAS bug fix patches
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.0.0.rc2
>
> [PATCH 1/3] APEI, GHES: Cleanup unnecessary function for lock-less
> [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE context
> [PATCH 3/3] RAS, HWPOISON: Fix wrong error recovery status
>
> The patch 1/3 & 3/3 are minor fixes which are irrelevant with patch
> 2/3. I send them together just to avoid fragments.
>
> The patch 2/3 is a RFC patch depending on the following thread:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/27/26
>
> Comments and suggestions are welcome.
>
Hi, Boris
Any comments?
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-19 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-16 2:34 Some RAS bug fix patches Chen, Gong
2014-07-16 2:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] APEI, GHES: Cleanup unnecessary function for lock-less list Chen, Gong
2014-07-20 8:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-16 2:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE context Chen, Gong
2014-07-21 8:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-21 17:14 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-21 21:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-21 22:03 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-21 22:44 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE Tony Luck
2014-07-22 17:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-22 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE context Borislav Petkov
2014-07-22 21:24 ` Tony Luck
2014-07-23 7:48 ` Chen, Gong
2014-07-16 2:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] RAS, HWPOISON: Fix wrong error recovery status Chen, Gong
2014-07-16 19:57 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2014-07-19 8:05 ` Chen, Gong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140719080534.GA32421@gchen.bj.intel.com \
--to=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).