From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] new API to allocate buffer-cache for superblock in non-movable area
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 02:03:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140731000355.GB25362@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53D985C0.3070300@lge.com>
On Thu 31-07-14 08:54:40, Gioh Kim wrote:
> 2014-07-30 i??i?? 7:11, Jan Kara i?' e,?:
> >On Wed 30-07-14 16:44:24, Gioh Kim wrote:
> >>2014-07-22 i??i?? 6:38, Jan Kara i?' e,?:
> >>>On Tue 22-07-14 09:30:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>>>On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 02:18:47PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
> >>>>>Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>This patch try to solve problem that a long-lasting page cache of
> >>>>>ext4 superblock disturbs page migration.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I've been testing CMA feature on my ARM-based platform
> >>>>>and found some pages for page caches cannot be migrated.
> >>>>>Some of them are page caches of superblock of ext4 filesystem.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Current ext4 reads superblock with sb_bread(). sb_bread() allocates page
> >>>>>from movable area. But the problem is that ext4 hold the page until
> >>>>>it is unmounted. If root filesystem is ext4 the page cannot be migrated forever.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I introduce a new API for allocating page from non-movable area.
> >>>>>It is useful for ext4 and others that want to hold page cache for a long time.
> >>>>
> >>>>There's no word on why you can't teach ext4 to still migrate that page.
> >>>>For all I know it might be impossible, but at least mention why.
> >>
> >>I am very sorry for lacking of details.
> >>
> >>In ext4_fill_super() the buffer-head of superblock is stored in sbi->s_sbh.
> >>The page belongs to the buffer-head is allocated from movable area.
> >>To migrate the page the buffer-head should be released via brelse().
> >>But brelse() is not called until unmount.
> > Hum, I don't see where in the code do we check buffer_head use count. Can
> >you please point me? Thanks.
>
> Filesystem code does not check buffer_head use count. sb_bread() returns
> the buffer_head that is included in bh_lru and has non-zero use count.
> You can see the bh_lru code in buffer.c: __find_get_clock() and
> lookup_bh_lru(). bh_lru_install() inserts the buffer_head into the
> bh_lru(). It first calls get_bh() to increase the use count and insert
> bh into the lru array.
>
> The buffer_head use count is non-zero until brelse() is called.
So I probably didn't phrase the question precisely enough. What I was
asking about is where exactly *migration* code checks buffer use count?
Because as I'm looking at buffer_migrate_page() we lock the buffers on a
migrated page but we don't look at buffer use counts... So it seems to me
that migration of a page with buffers should succeed even if buffer head
has an elevated use count. Now I think that it *should* check the buffer
use counts (it is dangerous to migrate buffers someone holds reference to)
but I just cannot find that place. Or does CMA use some other migration
function for buffer pages than buffer_migrate_page()?
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-31 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <53CDF437.4090306@lge.com>
[not found] ` <20140722073005.GT3935@laptop>
2014-07-22 9:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] new API to allocate buffer-cache for superblock in non-movable area Jan Kara
2014-07-30 7:44 ` Gioh Kim
2014-07-30 7:57 ` Kyungmin Park
2014-07-30 10:11 ` Jan Kara
2014-07-30 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-30 23:45 ` Gioh Kim
2014-07-30 23:54 ` Gioh Kim
2014-07-31 0:03 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2014-07-31 0:37 ` Gioh Kim
2014-07-31 12:21 ` Jan Kara
2014-08-01 0:07 ` Gioh Kim
2014-08-01 1:06 ` Gioh Kim
2014-08-01 9:57 ` Jan Kara
2014-08-01 13:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-01 15:24 ` Jan Kara
2014-08-01 16:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06 6:15 ` Gioh Kim
2014-08-01 8:34 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-08-01 9:15 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140731000355.GB25362@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gioh.kim@lge.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).